Hello Sam, On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 10:50:55AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 11:49:22AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > All implementations return 0 and the return value of mipi_dsi_drv_remove() > > is ignored anyhow. > > > > So change the prototype of the remove function to return no value. This > > way driver authors are not tempted to assume that passing an error to > > the upper layer is a good idea. All drivers are adapted accordingly. > > There is no intended change of behaviour. > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed and applied to drm-misc (drm-misc-next). > While applying updating panel-ebbg-ft8719 Good catch, at one time during creation of this series I intended to check next and hint about such requirements. Great you noticed that on your own, thanks! Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
