Hi Thomas, On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 11:39:15AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Mgag200 still mixes model-specific code and generic code in the same > functions. Separate it into distinct helpers. > > As part of this effort, convert the driver from simple-KMS helpers > to regular atomic helpers. The latter are way more flexible and can > be adapted easily for each hardware model. > > Tested on Matrox G200 and G200EH hardware. > > Thomas Zimmermann (14): > drm/mgag200: Split mgag200_modeset_init() > drm/mgag200: Move DAC-register setup into model-specific code > dmr/mgag200: Move ER/EW3 register initializatino to per-model code > drm/mgag200: Acquire I/O-register lock in atomic_commit_tail function > drm/mgag200: Store primary plane's color format in CRTC state > drm/mgag200: Reorganize before dropping simple-KMS helpers > drm/mgag200: Replace simple-KMS with regular atomic helpers > drm/mgag200: Set SCROFF in primary-plane code > drm/mgag200: Add per-device callbacks > drm/mgag200: Provide per-device callbacks for BMC synchronization > drm/mgag200: Provide per-device callbacks for PIXPLLC > drm/mgag200: Move mode-config to model-specific code > drm/mgag200: Move CRTC atomic_enable to model-specfic code > drm/mgag200: Remove type field from struct mga_device I have browsed the patches and they looked good. I was about to complain about several things, like bmc init, but then later this is all nicely cleaned up. Especially the pll setup stuff did not get much scrunity, as it like most of the patch looked like code movements. All patches except "Move DAC-register setup into model-specific code" are: Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > 14 files changed, 2804 insertions(+), 1586 deletions(-) This is not a diffstat that makes one go - yyipeee. But the improvements makes it worthwhile. Sam
