On 30/06/2022 09:14, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 30 June 2022 04:57:35 GMT+03:00, Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 5:36 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 1:14 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 28 June 2022 18:20:06 GMT+03:00, Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some userspace presumes that the first connected connector is the main
display, where it's supposed to display e.g. the login screen. For
laptops, this should be the main panel.
This patch call drm_helper_move_panel_connectors_to_head() after
drm_bridge_connector_init() to make sure eDP stay at head of
connected connector list. This fixes unexpected corruption happen
at eDP panel if eDP is not placed at head of connected connector
list.
The change itself is a good fix anyway. (And I'd ack it.) However I would like to understand why does it fix the corruption issue. What is we have eDP and DSI, with DSI ending up before the eDP? Would we see the issue?
Also could you please describe the mind of corruption you are observing?
I've spent a whole bunch of time poking at this and in the end my
conclusion is this:
1. The glitchyness seems to be a result of the Chrome OS userspace
somehow telling the kernel to do something wrong.
2. I believe (though I have no proof other than Kuogee's patch fixing
things) that the Chrome OS userspace is simply confused by the eDP
connector being second. This would imply that Kuogee's patch is
actually the right one.
3. It would be ideal if the Chrome OS userspace were fixed to handle
this, but it's an area of code that I've never looked at. It also
seems terribly low priority to fix since apparently other OSes have
similar problems (seems like this code was originally added by
RedHat?)
Specifically, I tested with a similar but "persistent" glitch that I
reproduced. The glitch Kuogee was digging into was a transitory glitch
on the eDP (internal) display when you plugged in a DP (external)
display. It would show up for a frame or two and then be fixed. I can
get a similar-looking glitch (vertical black and white bars) that
persists by doing these steps on a Chrome OS device (and Chrome OS
kernel):
a) Observe screen looks good.
b) Observe DP not connected.
c) Plug in DP
d) See transitory glitch on screen, then it all looks fine.
e) set_power_policy --ac_screen_dim_delay=5 --ac_screen_off_delay=10
f) Wait for screen to turn off
g) Unplug DP
h) Hit key on keyboard to wake device.
i) See glitchy.
j) Within 5 seconds: set_power_policy --ac_screen_dim_delay=5000
--ac_screen_off_delay=10000
Once I'm in the persistent glitch:
* The "screenshot" command in Chrome OS shows corruption. Not exactly
black and white bars, but the image produced has distinct bands of
garbage.
* I can actually toggle between VT2 and the main screen (VT1). Note
that VT1/VT2 are not quite the normal Linux managed solution--I
believe they're handled by frecon. In any case, when I switch to VT2
it looks normal (I can see the login prompt). Then back to VT1 and the
vertical bars glitch. Back to VT2 and it's normal. Back to VT1 and the
glitch again. This implies (especially with the extra evidence of
screenshot) that the display controller hardware is all fine and that
it's the underlying data that's somehow messed up.
fwiw, from looking at this a bit w/ Doug, I think the "glitch" is
simply just an un-renderered buffer being interpreted by the display
controller as UBWC (because userspace tells it to)
Thanks for the description. I think the userspace code should be fixed too, but this patch can go in on its own.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
After some time (please excuse me), musing with the code and even
picking up the commit for the merge branch, I understood the fact that I
did not like about this change. It moves all panel connectors (generic
code) from the DP-specific driver.
I'd like to retract my R-b. Please move this call to the msm_drm_init().
Calling this function somewhere after the ->kms_init() would make sure
that all panel connectors are close to the top of the list, whichever
MDP/DPU driver is used and whichever actual interface is bound to this
panel.
BR,
-R
When I pick Kuogee's patch then this "persistent" glitch goes away
just like the transitory one does.
I'm going to go ahead and do:
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry