Hello, [I dropped nearly all individuals from the Cc: list because various bounces reported to be unhappy about the long (logical) line.] On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 03:03:54PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > Looks good - just one minor change for the mctp-i2c driver, but only > worthwhile if you end up re-rolling this series for other reasons: > > > -static int mctp_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client) > > +static void mctp_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client) > > { > > struct mctp_i2c_client *mcli = i2c_get_clientdata(client); > > struct mctp_i2c_dev *midev = NULL, *tmp = NULL; > > @@ -1000,7 +1000,6 @@ static int mctp_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client) > > mctp_i2c_free_client(mcli); > > mutex_unlock(&driver_clients_lock); > > /* Callers ignore return code */ > > - return 0; > > } > > The comment there no longer makes much sense, I'd suggest removing that > too. Yeah, that was already pointed out to me in a private reply. It's already fixed in https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/ukl/linux/log/?h=i2c-remove-void > Either way: > > Reviewed-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Added to my tree, too. Thanks Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature