On 16/06/2022 20:09, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
Display resolution change is implemented through drm modeset. Older
modeset (resolution) has to be disabled first before newer modeset
(resolution) can be enabled. Display disable will turn off both
pixel clock and main link clock so that main link have to be
re-trained during display enable to have new video stream flow
again. At current implementation, display enable function manually
kicks up irq_hpd_handle which will read panel link status and start
link training if link status is not in sync state.
However, there is rare case that a particular panel links status keep
staying in sync for some period of time after main link had been shut
down previously at display disabled. In this case, main link retraining
will not be executed by irq_hdp_handle(). Hence video stream of newer
display resolution will fail to be transmitted to panel due to main
link is not in sync between host and panel.
This patch will bypass irq_hpd_handle() in favor of directly call
dp_ctrl_on_stream() to always perform link training in regardless of
main link status. So that no unexpected exception resolution change
failure cases will happen. Also this implementation are more efficient
than manual kicking off irq_hpd_handle function.
Changes in v2:
-- set force_link_train flag on DP only (is_edp == false)
Changes in v3:
-- revise commit text
-- add Fixes tag
Changes in v4:
-- revise commit text
Changes in v5:
-- fix spelling at commit text
Changes in v6:
-- split dp_ctrl_on_stream() for phy test case
-- revise commit text for modeset
Changes in v7:
-- drop 0 assignment at local variable (ret = 0)
Changes in v8:
-- add patch to remove pixel_rate from dp_ctrl
Fixes: 62671d2ef24b ("drm/msm/dp: fixes wrong connection state caused by failure of link train")
Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.h | 3 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 13 ++++++-------
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
index af7a80c..01028b5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
@@ -1551,7 +1551,7 @@ static int dp_ctrl_process_phy_test_request(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
ret = dp_ctrl_on_link(&ctrl->dp_ctrl);
if (!ret)
- ret = dp_ctrl_on_stream(&ctrl->dp_ctrl);
+ ret = dp_ctrl_on_stream_phy_test_report(&ctrl->dp_ctrl);
else
DRM_ERROR("failed to enable DP link controller\n");
@@ -1807,7 +1807,27 @@ static int dp_ctrl_link_retrain(struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
return dp_ctrl_setup_main_link(ctrl, &training_step);
}
-int dp_ctrl_on_stream(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
+int dp_ctrl_on_stream_phy_test_report(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct dp_ctrl_private *ctrl;
+
+ ctrl = container_of(dp_ctrl, struct dp_ctrl_private, dp_ctrl);
+
+ ctrl->dp_ctrl.pixel_rate = ctrl->panel->dp_mode.drm_mode.clock;
Stephen has raised an interesting question. Comparing this to the
dp_ctrl_on_stream(), he noticed that we do not halve the pixel clock
here (if the wide bus is supported). So, the question is if this is
correct or not.
+
+ ret = dp_ctrl_enable_stream_clocks(ctrl);
+ if (ret) {
+ DRM_ERROR("Failed to start pixel clocks. ret=%d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ dp_ctrl_send_phy_test_pattern(ctrl);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int dp_ctrl_on_stream(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl, bool force_link_train)
{
int ret = 0;
bool mainlink_ready = false;
@@ -1843,12 +1863,7 @@ int dp_ctrl_on_stream(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
goto end;
}
- if (ctrl->link->sink_request & DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN) {
- dp_ctrl_send_phy_test_pattern(ctrl);
- return 0;
- }
-
- if (!dp_ctrl_channel_eq_ok(ctrl))
+ if (force_link_train || !dp_ctrl_channel_eq_ok(ctrl))
dp_ctrl_link_retrain(ctrl);
/* stop txing train pattern to end link training */
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
