On Tuesday, June 21st, 2022 at 22:39, Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Kernel uapi headers are supposed to use __[us]{8,16,32,64} types defined > by <linux/types.h> as opposed to 'uint32_t' and similar. See [1] for the > relevant discussion about this topic. In this particular case, the usage > of 'uint64_t' escaped headers_check as these macros are not being called > here. However, the following program triggers a compilation error: > > #include <drm/drm_fourcc.h> > > int main() > { > unsigned long x = AMD_FMT_MOD_CLEAR(RB); > return 0; > } > > gcc error: > drm.c:5:27: error: ‘uint64_t’ undeclared (first use in this function) > 5 | unsigned long x = AMD_FMT_MOD_CLEAR(RB); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > This patch changes AMD_FMT_MOD_{SET,CLEAR} macros to use the correct > integer types, which fixes the above issue. > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/5/18 > > Fixes: 8ba16d599374 ("drm/fourcc: Add AMD DRM modifiers.") > Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Simon Ser <contact@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc'ing Bas as well > --- > include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h > index f1972154a594..0980678d502d 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h > @@ -1444,11 +1444,11 @@ drm_fourcc_canonicalize_nvidia_format_mod(__u64 modifier) > #define AMD_FMT_MOD_PIPE_MASK 0x7 > > #define AMD_FMT_MOD_SET(field, value) \ > - ((uint64_t)(value) << AMD_FMT_MOD_##field##_SHIFT) > + ((__u64)(value) << AMD_FMT_MOD_##field##_SHIFT) > #define AMD_FMT_MOD_GET(field, value) \ > (((value) >> AMD_FMT_MOD_##field##_SHIFT) & AMD_FMT_MOD_##field##_MASK) > #define AMD_FMT_MOD_CLEAR(field) \ > - (~((uint64_t)AMD_FMT_MOD_##field##_MASK << AMD_FMT_MOD_##field##_SHIFT)) > + (~((__u64)AMD_FMT_MOD_##field##_MASK << AMD_FMT_MOD_##field##_SHIFT)) > > #if defined(__cplusplus) > } > -- > 2.37.0.rc0.104.g0611611a94-goog