Thanks! Will push these two patches upstream On Mon, 2022-06-13 at 09:59 +0000, Lin, Wayne wrote: > [Public] > > Hi Lyude, > > Feel free to add > Reviewed-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2022 4:18 AM > > To: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>; Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>; > > Thomas > > Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx>; Lin, Wayne > > <Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx>; Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>; Lakha, > > Bhawanpreet <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@xxxxxxx>; Rajkumar Subbiah > > <rsubbia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; open list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/dp_mst: Get rid of old comment in > > drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state docs > > > > We don't actually care about connection_mutex here anymore, so let's get > > rid of the comment mentioning it in this function's kdocs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 3 +-- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > > index d6e595b95f07..9f96132a5d74 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > > @@ -5458,8 +5458,7 @@ > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_topology_state_funcs); > > * > > * This function wraps drm_atomic_get_priv_obj_state() passing in the MST > > atomic > > * state vtable so that the private object state returned is that of a > > MST > > - * topology object. Also, drm_atomic_get_private_obj_state() expects the > > caller > > - * to care of the locking, so warn if don't hold the connection_mutex. > > + * topology object. > > * > > * RETURNS: > > * > > -- > > 2.35.3 > > -- > Regards, > Wayne Lin > -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat
