Actually I hate to ask but could you resend this and the other patch that you sent and make sure that dri-devel@ is explicitly in the to: list? For some reason these patches don't seem to be coming up on patchwork On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 13:54 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Will push to the appropriate branch in a moment > > On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 21:14 +0800, Jiang Jian wrote: > > there is an unexpected word "the" in the comments that need to be dropped > > > > file: drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > line: 1600 > > * Doesn't account the the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each > > changed to > > * Doesn't account the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiang Jian <jiangjian@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > index e7c22c2ca90c..499f75768523 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > @@ -1597,7 +1597,7 @@ static int drm_dp_aux_reply_duration(const struct > > drm_dp_aux_msg *msg) > > * Calculate the length of the i2c transfer in usec, assuming > > * the i2c bus speed is as specified. Gives the the "worst" > > * case estimate, ie. successful while as long as possible. > > - * Doesn't account the the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each > > + * Doesn't account the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each > > * message includes a START, ADDRESS and STOP. Neither does it > > * account for additional random variables such as clock stretching. > > */ > -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat
