Re: 回复: [PATCH 5/5] drm/nouveau: Fix spelling typo in comments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



No problem! I just pushed the patch you sent separately (which I'm assuming is the patch you previously sent in a series by mistake) so it should be all set.

On Thu, 2022-06-16 at 14:56 +0800, 1064094935 wrote:
Hi,
I'm very sorry, these five patches are not a series, the other four are from other branches. I made a mistake when submitting the patch. Can you help me push this to drm-misc? Or I will resubmit this patch again.

Best regards,
pengfuyuan

------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "Lyude Paul" <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>;
发送时间: 2022年5月28日(星期六) 凌晨0:27
收件人: "1064094935"<1064094935@xxxxxx>;"Ben Skeggs"<bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>;
抄送: "Karol Herbst"<kherbst@xxxxxxxxxx>;"David Airlie"<airlied@xxxxxxxx>;"Daniel Vetter"<daniel@xxxxxxxx>;"dri-devel"<dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;"nouveau"<nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;"linux-kernel"<linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;"pengfuyuan"<pengfuyuan@xxxxxxxxxx>;"k2ci"<kernel-bot@xxxxxxxxxx>;
主题: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/nouveau: Fix spelling typo in comments

Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>

Do you need me to push this to drm-misc? Or will this be pushed as one series?

On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 12:22 +0800, 1064094935@xxxxxx wrote:
> From: pengfuyuan <pengfuyuan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Fix spelling typo in comments.
>
> Reported-by: k2ci <kernel-bot@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: pengfuyuan <pengfuyuan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvhw/drf.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvhw/drf.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvhw/drf.h
> index bd0fc41446e2..d6969c0e2f29 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvhw/drf.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvhw/drf.h
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@
>  #define DRF_MD_(X,_1,_2,_3,_4,_5,_6,_7,_8,_9,_10,IMPL,...) IMPL
>  #define DRF_MD(A...) DRF_MD_(X, ##A, DRF_MD_I, DRF_MD_N)(X, ##A)
>  
> -/* Helper for testing against field value in aribtrary object */
> +/* Helper for testing against field value in arbitrary object */
>  #define DRF_TV_N(X,e,p,o,d,r, 
> f,cmp,v)                                          \
>         NVVAL_TEST_X(DRF_RD_X(e, (p), (o), d##_##r   ), d##_##r##_##f, cmp,
> (v))
>  #define
> DRF_TV_I(X,e,p,o,d,r,i,f,cmp,v)                                          \
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@
>  #define DRF_TV_(X,_1,_2,_3,_4,_5,_6,_7,_8,_9,IMPL,...) IMPL
>  #define DRF_TV(A...) DRF_TV_(X, ##A, DRF_TV_I, DRF_TV_N)(X, ##A)
>  
> -/* Helper for testing against field definition in aribtrary object */
> +/* Helper for testing against field definition in arbitrary object */
>  #define DRF_TD_N(X,e,p,o,d,r, 
> f,cmp,v)                                                          \
>         NVVAL_TEST_X(DRF_RD_X(e, (p), (o), d##_##r   ), d##_##r##_##f, cmp,
> d##_##r##_##f##_##v)
>  #define
> DRF_TD_I(X,e,p,o,d,r,i,f,cmp,v)                                             
>              \


-- 
Cheers,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat

[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux