Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] drm/bridge: anx7625: Register Type-C mode switches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 14/06/22 18:57, Prashant Malani ha scritto:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 1:18 AM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Il 09/06/22 20:09, Prashant Malani ha scritto:
When the DT node has "switches" available, register a Type-C mode-switch
for each listed "switch". This allows the driver to receive state
information about what operating mode a Type-C port and its connected
peripherals are in, as well as status information (like VDOs) related to
that state.

The callback function is currently a stub, but subsequent patches will
implement the required functionality.

Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Changes since v2:
- No changes.

   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++
   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.h |  6 ++
   2 files changed, 79 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c
index 07ed44c6b839..d41a21103bd3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
   #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
   #include <linux/slab.h>
   #include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/usb/typec_mux.h>
   #include <linux/workqueue.h>

   #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
@@ -2581,9 +2582,59 @@ static void anx7625_runtime_disable(void *data)
       pm_runtime_disable(data);
   }

+static int anx7625_typec_mux_set(struct typec_mux_dev *mux,
+                              struct typec_mux_state *state)
+{
+     return 0;
+}
+
+static int anx7625_register_mode_switch(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
+                                     struct anx7625_data *ctx)
+{
+     struct anx7625_port_data *port_data;
+     struct typec_mux_desc mux_desc = {};
+     char name[32];
+     u32 port_num;
+     int ret;
+
+     ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &port_num);
+     if (ret)
+             return ret;
+
+     if (port_num >= ctx->num_typec_switches) {
+             dev_err(dev, "Invalid port number specified: %d\n", port_num);
+             return -EINVAL;
+     }
+
+     port_data = &ctx->typec_ports[port_num];
+     port_data->ctx = ctx;
+     mux_desc.fwnode = &node->fwnode;
+     mux_desc.drvdata = port_data;
+     snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s-%u", node->name, port_num);
+     mux_desc.name = name;
+     mux_desc.set = anx7625_typec_mux_set;
+
+     port_data->typec_mux = typec_mux_register(dev, &mux_desc);
+     if (IS_ERR(port_data->typec_mux)) {
+             ret = PTR_ERR(port_data->typec_mux);
+             dev_err(dev, "Mode switch register for port %d failed: %d", port_num, ret);
+     }

Please return 0 at the end of this function.

         if (IS_ERR(....)) {
                 ......code......
                 return ret;
         }

         return 0;
}

May I ask why? We're not missing any return paths. I would rather we
keep it as is (which has the valid return value).


I know that you're not missing any return paths.

That's only because the proposed one is a common pattern in the kernel
and it's only for consistency.

Regards,
Angelo




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux