Re: [PATCH] drm/arm/hdlcd: Take over EFI framebuffer properly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

Am 14.06.22 um 23:06 schrieb Robin Murphy:
On 2022-06-14 14:48, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi

Am 14.06.22 um 15:04 schrieb Robin Murphy:
The Arm Juno board EDK2 port has provided an EFI GOP display via HDLCD0
for some time now, which works nicely as an early framebuffer. However,
once the HDLCD driver probes and takes over the hardware, it should
take over the logical framebuffer as well, otherwise the now-defunct GOP
device hangs about and virtual console output inevitably disappears into
the wrong place most of the time.

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c
index af59077a5481..a5d04884658b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_drv.c
@@ -331,6 +331,8 @@ static int hdlcd_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
          goto err_vblank;
      }
+    drm_fb_helper_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(NULL, "hdlcd", false);
+

In addition to what Javier said, it appears to be too late to call this function. If anything her etouches hardware, you might accidentally interfere with the EFI-related driver. Rather call it at the top of ldlcd_drm_bind().

OK, thanks for the info. I mostly just copied the pattern from the simplest-looking other users (sun4i, tegra, vc4) who all seemed to call it fairly late, and indeed naively it seemed logical not to do it *too* early when there's more chance we might fail to bind and leave the user with no framebuffer at all. In particular, waiting until we've bound the HDMI encoder seems like a good idea in the case of the Juno board (which is the only real HDLCD user), as the I2C bus often gets stuck if the System Control Processor is having a bad day. I also don't believe there's anything here that would affect efifb more than the fact that once the DRM CRTC is alive we simply stop scanning out from the region of memory that efifb is managing, but if it's considered good practice to do this early then I can certainly make that change too.
We've been struggling with this a bit. If it works reliably, you're welcome to leave it where it is.

Historically, most drivers call this function very early. But for error recovery it would be better to do it as late as possible. Ideally, drivers would first initialize their DRM software state, then kickout the generic driver, and finally take over hardware. But that would require a careful review of each driver. :/

Best regards
Thomas


Cheers,
Robin.

--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux