On Wed, 2022-05-25 at 14:49 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 12:47:34PM +0200, Guillaume Ranquet wrote: > > From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > DPINTF is similar to DPI but does not have the exact same feature > > set > > or register layouts. > > > > DPINTF is the sink of the display pipeline that is connected to the > > DisplayPort controller and encoder unit. It takes the same clocks > > as > > DPI. > > > > Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml | 13 ++++++++- > > ---- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.y > > aml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.y > > aml > > index dd2896a40ff0..6d9f6c11806e 100644 > > --- > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.y > > aml > > +++ > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.y > > aml > > @@ -4,16 +4,16 @@ > > $id: > > http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml# > > $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > > > -title: mediatek DPI Controller Device Tree Bindings > > +title: mediatek DPI/DPINTF Controller > > > > maintainers: > > - CK Hu <ck.hu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > - Jitao shi <jitao.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > description: | > > - The Mediatek DPI function block is a sink of the display > > subsystem and > > - provides 8-bit RGB/YUV444 or 8/10/10-bit YUV422 pixel data on a > > parallel > > - output bus. > > + The Mediatek DPI and DPINTF function blocks are a sink of the > > display > > + subsystem and provides 8-bit RGB/YUV444 or 8/10/10-bit YUV422 > > pixel data on a > > + parallel output bus. > > > > properties: > > compatible: > > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties: > > - mediatek,mt8173-dpi > > - mediatek,mt8183-dpi > > - mediatek,mt8192-dpi > > + - mediatek,mt8195-dpintf > > Weren't you supposed to change it to have a separator between dp and > intf? > > If it's no longer in your plans, the second patch should have > s/dp_intf/dpintf/ > > Maxime Hello Maxime, Thank for your review. I will do this in next version. BRs, Bo-Chen > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
