Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 3/3] drm/msm/dpu: Add interface support for CRC debugfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 04:02, Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 6/2/2022 3:51 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On 28/05/2022 01:23, Jessica Zhang wrote:
> >> On 5/27/2022 12:46 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On 27/05/2022 21:54, Jessica Zhang wrote:
> >>>> Add support for writing CRC values for the interface block to
> >>>> the debugfs by calling the necessary MISR setup/collect methods.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@xxxxxxxxxxx>

[skipped]

> >>>> +
> >>>> +        phys->hw_intf->ops.setup_misr(phys->hw_intf, true, 1);
> >>>> +    }
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +int dpu_encoder_get_crc(const struct drm_encoder *drm_enc)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +    struct dpu_encoder_virt *dpu_enc;
> >>>> +    u32 crcs[MAX_PHYS_ENCODERS_PER_VIRTUAL];
> >>>> +
> >>>> +    int i, rc;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +    if (!drm_enc->crtc) {
> >>>> +        DRM_ERROR("no crtc found for encoder %d\n", drm_enc->index);
> >>>> +        return -EINVAL;
> >>>> +    }
> >>>> +
> >>>> +    dpu_enc = to_dpu_encoder_virt(drm_enc);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +    for (i = 0; i < dpu_enc->num_phys_encs; i++) {
> >>>> +        struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys = dpu_enc->phys_encs[i];
> >>>> +
> >>>> +        if (!phys->hw_intf || !phys->hw_intf->ops.collect_misr)
> >>>> +            continue;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +        rc = phys->hw_intf->ops.collect_misr(phys->hw_intf, &crcs[i]);
> >>>
> >>> This doesn't look fully correct. Do we need to skip the indices for
> >>> the phys without a backing hw_intf?
> >>
> >> Sorry if I'm misunderstanding your question, but don't we need to have
> >> a backing hw_intf (and skip if there isn't any) since the methods for
> >> collecting/setting MISR registers is within the hw_intf?
> >
> > Yes. So the question if we should skip the phys and leave the crcs[i]
> > untouched, skip the phys and sset crcs[i] to 0 or change
> > dpu_crtc_parse_crc_source() to return the number of intf-backed
> > phys_enc's and do not skip any crcs[i].
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
>
> Is it possible to hit a case where a phys_encoder won't have a
> corresponding hw_intf?
>
> AFAIK, it seems guaranteed that a phys_encoder will have an hw_intf
> since dpu_encoder_setup_display will skip incrementing num_phys_encs if
> dpu_encoder_get_intf fails [1].

WB encoders won't have hw_intf. The code checks that either get_intf
or get_wb succeeds.

>
> [1]
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/blob/msm-next/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c#L2263


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux