Hi Daniel, Thanks for looking into the patch and for your comments. On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 03:57:56PM -0700, Daniel Latypov wrote: > A few initial notes: > a) normally, `select`ing other kconfigs is discouraged. It's not > explicitly called out in > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/style.html#test-kconfig-entries > but this was the conclusion after some debate on the mailing lists > earlier. > > b) I see `dst` is allocated with kzalloc but not freed. Should we use > `kunit_kzalloc()` instead so it does get automatically freed? Ooops yes, it was in my "I'll handle that once it works" list, but I forgot to fix it, thanks for pointing it out > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 12 ++ > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile | 3 + > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_format_helper_test.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 3 files changed, 181 insertions(+) > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_format_helper_test.c > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig > > > > index e88c497fa010..d92be6faef15 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig > > > > @@ -76,6 +76,18 @@ config DRM_KMS_HELPER > > > > help > > > > CRTC helpers for KMS drivers. > > > > > > > > +config DRM_FORMAR_HELPER_TEST > > > > + bool "drm_format_helper tests" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS > > > > + depends on DRM && KUNIT=y > > > > + select DRM_KMS_HELPER > > From above, a) > Specifically here, it'd be encouraged to instead do > depends on DRM && KUNIT=y && DRM_KMS_HELPER My first attempt was to go with: depends on KUNIT=y && DRM && DRM_KMS_HELPER However, when I try to run the tests I get this error: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=drivers/gpu/drm --arch=x86_64 Regenerating .config ... Populating config with: $ make ARCH=x86_64 olddefconfig O=.kunit ERROR:root:Not all Kconfig options selected in kunitconfig were in the generated .config. This is probably due to unsatisfied dependencies. Missing: CONFIG_DRM_KMS_HELPER=y, CONFIG_DRM_FORMAR_HELPER_TEST=y I wasn't able to figure out why that was happening, so I decided to use "select", which seems to solve the problem. Do you know why this could be happening? > Ideally, using a .kunitconfig file would make it so having to select > DRM_KMS_HELPER manually isn't that annoying. > > > > AFAIK, kunit test cases are supposed to have a .kunitconfig too to > > > enable the kunit tests easily. > > > > > > Maxime > > > > A .kuniconfig example is present in the cover letter. My understanding > > from the docs: > > > > https://docs.kernel.org/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.html#create-a-kunitconfig-file > > The bit of the documentation you're looking for is > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.html#defining-a-set-of-tests > You can create a drivers/gpu/drm/.kunitconfig file and run with > $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=drivers/gpu/drm --arch=x86_86 > > The contents of that file would be just like > CONFIG_KUNIT=y > CONFIG_DRM=y > CONFIG_DRM_KMS_HELPER=y # if no `select` > CONFIG_DRM_FORMAR_HELPER_TEST=y Noted, thanks a lot, I'll include it in the final version of the patch. By the way, I also included it in an unrelated patch, just in case you are wondering why I emailed you a random patch: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/20220531181246.190729-1-jose.exposito89@xxxxxxxxx/T/ Thanks a lot for your help, José Expósito > Re "kunit test cases are supposed to have a .kunitconfig too" > As I noted in the docs: > This is a relatively new feature (5.12+) so we don’t have any > conventions yet about on what files should be checked in versus just > kept around locally. It’s up to you and your maintainer to decide if a > config is useful enough to submit (and therefore have to maintain). > > So it's up to whatever people think works best/is worth it. > I think in this case, it makes sense to add the file. > > > Is that, like the .config file, the .kunitconfig file is not meant to > > be included in git, but I'm sure someone else will clarify this point. > > That bit of the docs needs to be rewritten. > You're recommended to check in a drivers/gpu/drm/.kunitconfig file into git. > > Context: `kunit.py` used to use the "<root>/.kunitconfig" file. > Anytime you wanted to run more tests, you'd append to that file. > So we agreed that no one should check in that file specifically. > > Now kunit.py > * uses "<build-dir>/.kunitconfig", by default: ".kunit/.kunitconfig" > * has the --kunitconfig flag so you can use different files > so it's no longer as relevant. > > Hope that helps, > Daniel