On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:02 AM Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2022 at 14:18, Jason Ekstrand <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch series actually contains two new ioctls. There is the export one
> mentioned above as well as an RFC for an import ioctl which provides the other
> half. The intention is to land the export ioctl since it seems like there's
> no real disagreement on that one. The import ioctl, however, has a lot of
> debate around it so it's intended to be RFC-only for now.
Errr, I think we're good with this one now right?
Yeah, I dropped the RFC from the patch, just not the description in the cover letter, apparently.
>From the uAPI point of view, having looked through the Mesa MR, both are:
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Yes, I agree it's gotten sufficient review at this point that I think we can call the uAPI reviewed. I'm good with landing now. Sorry that took so long but the original version I had only used half of the new API and I wanted to make sure both halves got good testing.
--Jason
Cheers,
Daniel
