On 25.05.2022 09:45, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 24.05.22 20:32, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: >> On 5/21/22 6:47 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> I'm not a developer and I'm don't known the details of this thread and >>> the backstory of the regression, but it sounds like that's the approach >>> that is needed here until someone comes up with a fix for the regression >>> exposed by bdd8b6c98239. >>> >>> But if I'm wrong, please tell me. >> >> You are mostly right, I think. Reverting bdd8b6c98239 fixes >> it. There is another way to fix it, though. > > Yeah, I'm aware of it. But it seems... > >> The patch proposed >> by Jan Beulich also fixes the regression on my system, so as >> the person reporting this is a regression, I would also be satisfied >> with Jan's patch instead of reverting bdd8b6c98239 as a fix. Jan >> posted his proposed patch here: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/9385fa60-fa5d-f559-a137-6608408f88b0@xxxxxxxx/ > > ...that approach is not making any progress either? > > Jan, can could provide a short status update here? I'd really like to > get this regression fixed one way or another rather sooner than later, > as this is taken way to long already IMHO. What kind of status update could I provide? I've not heard back from anyone of the maintainers, so I have no way to know what (if anything) I need to do. Jan
