On 2022-05-03 01:02:42, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On 03/05/2022 00:42, Marijn Suijten wrote: > > On 2022-05-02 13:47:51, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-05-01 12:56:20) > >>> Remove dividers that are not recommended for DSI DPHY mode when setting > >> > >> Is "DPHY" intentional or just "PHY" should be here? > >> > >>> up the clock tree for the DSI pixel clock. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c | 10 ++++------ > >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c > >>> index 6e506feb111f..66ed1919a1db 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c > >>> @@ -687,15 +687,13 @@ static int pll_7nm_register(struct dsi_pll_7nm *pll_7nm, struct clk_hw **provide > >>> snprintf(clk_name, 32, "dsi%d_pclk_mux", pll_7nm->phy->id); > >>> snprintf(parent, 32, "dsi%d_pll_bit_clk", pll_7nm->phy->id); > >>> snprintf(parent2, 32, "dsi%d_pll_by_2_bit_clk", pll_7nm->phy->id); > >>> - snprintf(parent3, 32, "dsi%d_pll_out_div_clk", pll_7nm->phy->id); > >>> - snprintf(parent4, 32, "dsi%d_pll_post_out_div_clk", pll_7nm->phy->id); > >>> > >>> hw = devm_clk_hw_register_mux(dev, clk_name, > >>> ((const char *[]){ > >>> - parent, parent2, parent3, parent4 > >>> - }), 4, 0, pll_7nm->phy->base + > >>> + parent, parent2, > >>> + }), 2, 0, pll_7nm->phy->base + > >>> REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_CMN_CLK_CFG1, > >>> - 0, 2, 0, NULL); > >>> + 0, 1, 0, NULL); > >> > >> Can you followup with a patch to move to clk_parent_data instead of > >> strings? > > > > Dmitry and I discussed this a while ago, and I actually have patches in > > progress converting this. Dmitry, if you haven't started on the > > conversion yet, perhaps it's efficient if I respin my efforts and submit > > them soon? > > Yes, please. I'm under the pile of other things. Your patches will be > appreciated. You don't have to convert all PHYs at once. Holding to my promise, the patches are now available on the lists: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20220523213837.1016542-1-marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t It was more convenient to convert the remaining PHYs on top of the 14/28nm I had already done, it's mostly trivial work anyway. - Marijn