On Wed, 2022-05-18 at 15:39 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-05-18 at 16:28 +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> > > > struct kvm_arch {
> > > > @@ -1258,6 +1260,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> > > > hpa_t hv_root_tdp;
> > > > spinlock_t hv_root_tdp_lock;
> > > > #endif
> > > > + bool apic_id_changed;
> > >
> > > What's the value of this boolean? No one reads it.
> >
> > I use it in later patches to kill the guest during nested VM entry
> > if it attempts to use nested AVIC after any vCPU changed APIC ID.
>
> Then the flag should be introduced in the later patch, because (a) it's dead code
> if that patch is never merged and (b) it's impossible to review this patch for
> correctness without seeing the usage, e.g. setting apic_id_changed isn't guarded
> with a lock and so the usage may or may not be susceptible to races.
I can't disagree with you on this, this was just somewhat a hack I wasn't sure
(and not yet 100% sure I will move forward with) so I cut this corner.
Thanks for the review!
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
>
> > > > + apic->vcpu->kvm->arch.apic_id_changed = true;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
