Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-05-11 17:41:50)
> On 12/05/2022 03:02, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
> > index af7a80c..f3e333e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c
> > @@ -1389,8 +1389,13 @@ void dp_ctrl_reset_irq_ctrl(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl, bool enable)
> >
> > dp_catalog_ctrl_reset(ctrl->catalog);
> >
> > - if (enable)
> > - dp_catalog_ctrl_enable_irq(ctrl->catalog, enable);
> > + /*
> > + * all dp controller programmable registers will not
> > + * be reset to default value after DP_SW_RESET
> > + * therefore interrupt mask bits have to be updated
> > + * to enable/disable interrupts
> > + */
> > + dp_catalog_ctrl_enable_irq(ctrl->catalog, enable);
> > }
> >
> > void dp_ctrl_phy_init(struct dp_ctrl *dp_ctrl)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > index c388323..79439b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > @@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ struct dp_display_private {
> > struct dp_ctrl *ctrl;
> > struct dp_debug *debug;
> >
> > + atomic_t suspended;
>
> I think it'd be better to protect it with event_lock rather than using
> atomics.
Agreed. I think the concern is that the event queue will have "stuff" in
it. If the event queue was all a threaded irq we could simply call
synchronize_irq() after disabling the irq bit in the DP hardware and
then we would know it is safe to power down the DP logic. Unfortunately
the event queue is a kthread so we can't do that and we have to rewrite
synchronize_irq() by checking that the event queue is empty and waiting
for it to empty out otherwise. It's not safe enough to simply do the
power operations underneath the event_lock because there's a queue in
the kthread that might be waiting to grab the event_lock to process.
