Hello Daniel, On 5/5/22 14:11, Daniel Vetter wrote: [snip] >> >> And while I agree with you that these midlayer flags are horrible, that is >> what any other fbdev that makes use of a firmware-provided framebuffer set, >> so simpledrm emulated fbdev shouldn't be the exception IMO. > > So we discussed this a pile more on irc, and at least my take is that > people who run simpledrm but want to combine that with fbdev drivers and > expect it to all work nicely we can probably ignore. At least until all > this sysfb stuff is nicely unified, and at that point we shouldn't need > special flags anymore. I'm OK with this take and happy to just drop this patch-set then. My worry was just that someone could complain that we broke their uncommon setup [0]. [0]: https://xkcd.com/1172/. -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Linux Engineering Red Hat
