On 5/4/22 18:50, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 12:46 PM Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Alex,
>>
>> On 5/4/22 15:48, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> This reverts commit b95dc06af3e683d6b7ddbbae178b2b2a21ee8b2b.
>>>
>>> This workaround is no longer necessary. We have a better workaround
>>> in commit f95af4a9236695 ("drm/amdgpu: don't runtime suspend if there are displays attached (v3)").
>>>
>>
>> I would write this line instead as:
>>
>> in commit f95af4a9236695 ("drm/amdgpu: don't runtime suspend if there are
>> displays attached (v3)").
>
> When you do it that way checkpatch and some maintainers complain about
> splitting up a commit line across multiple lines.
>
It does indeed, how silly. Scratch my comment then.
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat
