Re: [PATCH 03/25] drm/msm/dpu: add support for SSPP allocation to RM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2/9/2022 9:24 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Add support for handling and allocting SSPP blocks through the resource
manager. Handling code is not converted to use it though.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.h | 10 +++
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h     |  1 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c   | 18 ++---
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c      | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.h      |  6 ++
  5 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.h
index 1b18de957500..f805c30643b1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.h
@@ -388,6 +388,16 @@ struct dpu_hw_pipe {
  };
struct dpu_kms;
+/**
+ * to_dpu_hw_pipe - convert base object dpu_hw_base to container
+ * @hw: Pointer to base hardware block
+ * return: Pointer to hardware block container
+ */
+static inline struct dpu_hw_pipe *to_dpu_hw_pipe(struct dpu_hw_blk *hw)
+{
+	return container_of(hw, struct dpu_hw_pipe, base);
+}
+
  /**
   * dpu_hw_sspp_init - initializes the sspp hw driver object.
   * Should be called once before accessing every pipe.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h
index 2d385b4b7f5e..824495ad2392 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.h
@@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ struct dpu_global_state {
  	uint32_t ctl_to_enc_id[CTL_MAX - CTL_0];
  	uint32_t intf_to_enc_id[INTF_MAX - INTF_0];
  	uint32_t dspp_to_enc_id[DSPP_MAX - DSPP_0];
+	uint32_t pipe_to_plane_id[SSPP_MAX - SSPP_NONE];
  };
struct dpu_global_state
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
index c04c3be16d85..146dbccd79cd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
@@ -1235,8 +1235,6 @@ static void dpu_plane_destroy(struct drm_plane *plane)
  		/* this will destroy the states as well */
  		drm_plane_cleanup(plane);
- dpu_hw_sspp_destroy(pdpu->pipe_hw);
-
  		kfree(pdpu);
  	}
  }
@@ -1445,14 +1443,13 @@ struct drm_plane *dpu_plane_init(struct drm_device *dev,
  	pdpu->pipe = pipe;
/* initialize underlying h/w driver */
-	pdpu->pipe_hw = dpu_hw_sspp_init(pipe, kms->mmio, kms->catalog);
-	if (IS_ERR(pdpu->pipe_hw)) {
-		DPU_ERROR("[%u]SSPP init failed\n", pipe);
-		ret = PTR_ERR(pdpu->pipe_hw);
+	if (!kms->rm.sspp_blks[pipe - SSPP_NONE])
  		goto clean_plane;
-	} else if (!pdpu->pipe_hw->cap || !pdpu->pipe_hw->cap->sblk) {
+	pdpu->pipe_hw = to_dpu_hw_pipe(kms->rm.sspp_blks[pipe - SSPP_NONE]);
+
+	if (!pdpu->pipe_hw->cap || !pdpu->pipe_hw->cap->sblk) {
  		DPU_ERROR("[%u]SSPP init returned invalid cfg\n", pipe);
-		goto clean_sspp;
+		goto clean_plane;
  	}
format_list = pdpu->pipe_hw->cap->sblk->format_list;
@@ -1462,7 +1459,7 @@ struct drm_plane *dpu_plane_init(struct drm_device *dev,
  				format_list, num_formats,
  				supported_format_modifiers, type, NULL);
  	if (ret)
-		goto clean_sspp;
+		goto clean_plane;
pdpu->catalog = kms->catalog; @@ -1494,9 +1491,6 @@ struct drm_plane *dpu_plane_init(struct drm_device *dev,
  					pipe, plane->base.id);
  	return plane;
-clean_sspp:
-	if (pdpu && pdpu->pipe_hw)
-		dpu_hw_sspp_destroy(pdpu->pipe_hw);
  clean_plane:
  	kfree(pdpu);
  	return ERR_PTR(ret);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
index f9c83d6e427a..21c9e513f1f6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
  #include "dpu_hw_lm.h"
  #include "dpu_hw_ctl.h"
  #include "dpu_hw_pingpong.h"
+#include "dpu_hw_sspp.h"
  #include "dpu_hw_intf.h"
  #include "dpu_hw_dspp.h"
  #include "dpu_hw_merge3d.h"
@@ -35,6 +36,14 @@ int dpu_rm_destroy(struct dpu_rm *rm)
  {
  	int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rm->sspp_blks); i++) {
+		struct dpu_hw_pipe *hw;
+
+		if (rm->sspp_blks[i]) {
+			hw = to_dpu_hw_pipe(rm->sspp_blks[i]);
+			dpu_hw_sspp_destroy(hw);
+		}
+	}
  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rm->pingpong_blks); i++) {
  		struct dpu_hw_pingpong *hw;
@@ -166,6 +175,24 @@ int dpu_rm_init(struct dpu_rm *rm,
  		rm->pingpong_blks[pp->id - PINGPONG_0] = &hw->base;
  	}
+ for (i = 0; i < cat->sspp_count; i++) {
+		struct dpu_hw_pipe *hw;
+		const struct dpu_sspp_cfg *sspp = &cat->sspp[i];
+
+		if (sspp->id <= SSPP_NONE || sspp->id >= SSPP_MAX) {
+			DPU_ERROR("skip sspp %d with invalid id\n", sspp->id);
+			continue;
+		}
+		hw = dpu_hw_sspp_init(sspp->id, mmio, cat);
+		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(hw)) {
+			rc = PTR_ERR(hw);
+			DPU_ERROR("failed sspp object creation: err %d\n",
+				rc);
+			goto fail;
+		}
+		rm->sspp_blks[sspp->id - SSPP_NONE] = &hw->base;
+	}
+
  	for (i = 0; i < cat->intf_count; i++) {
  		struct dpu_hw_intf *hw;
  		const struct dpu_intf_cfg *intf = &cat->intf[i];
@@ -660,3 +687,57 @@ int dpu_rm_get_assigned_resources(struct dpu_rm *rm,
return num_blks;
  }
+
+enum dpu_sspp dpu_rm_get_sspp(struct dpu_rm *rm, struct dpu_global_state *global_state, uint32_t plane_id, bool yuv, bool scale)
+{

Right now we have only yuv and scale as requirements for the incoming plane. But these requirements can expand.

Do you think a enum req_mask will be a good addition here?
You can start with having 2 masks for YUV and Scale but atleast that way its expandable cleanly rather than just increasing function parameters here.


+	int i;
+	enum dpu_sspp pipe = SSPP_NONE;
+	struct dpu_hw_pipe *pipe_hw;
+	bool retry = false;
+
+retry_loop:
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rm->sspp_blks) && pipe == SSPP_NONE; i++) {
+		if (!rm->sspp_blks[i])
+			continue;
+		if (reserved_by_other(global_state->pipe_to_plane_id, i, plane_id))
+			continue;
+
+		pipe_hw = to_dpu_hw_pipe(rm->sspp_blks[i]);
+
+		/* skip incompatible planes */
+		if (scale && !(pipe_hw->cap->features & DPU_SSPP_SCALER))
+			continue;
+
+		if (yuv && (!(pipe_hw->cap->features & DPU_SSPP_SCALER) ||
+			    !(pipe_hw->cap->features & DPU_SSPP_CSC_ANY)))
+			continue;
+
+		/* For non-yuv, non-scaled planes try to find simple (DMA)
+		 * plane, fallback to VIG on a second try.
+		 *
+		 * This way we'd leave VIG pipes to be later used for YUV formats.
+		 */
+

this strategy should work. I just think we need to validate this quite a bit with some real world cases such as video playback with UI layers, opening and closing video players, browsers etc.

I am yet to review the usage of this in the next patches, but yes if even this wont kick in for small layers, we are protected.


+		if (!scale && !yuv && !retry &&
+		    (pipe_hw->cap->features & (DPU_SSPP_SCALER | DPU_SSPP_CSC_ANY)))
+			continue;
+
+		pipe = i + SSPP_NONE;
+	};
+
+	if (!scale && !yuv && !retry && pipe == SSPP_NONE) {
+		retry = true;
+		goto retry_loop;
+	}
+
+	if (pipe != SSPP_NONE)
+		global_state->pipe_to_plane_id[pipe - SSPP_NONE] = plane_id;
+
+	return pipe;
+}
+
+void dpu_rm_release_sspp(struct dpu_rm *rm, struct dpu_global_state *global_state, uint32_t plane_id)
+{
+	_dpu_rm_clear_mapping(global_state->pipe_to_plane_id,
+			ARRAY_SIZE(global_state->pipe_to_plane_id), plane_id);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.h
index 1f12c8d5b8aa..b759fe39f6d6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ struct dpu_global_state;
  /**
   * struct dpu_rm - DPU dynamic hardware resource manager
   * @pingpong_blks: array of pingpong hardware resources
+ * @sspp_blks: array of sspp hardware resources
   * @mixer_blks: array of layer mixer hardware resources
   * @ctl_blks: array of ctl hardware resources
   * @intf_blks: array of intf hardware resources
@@ -25,6 +26,7 @@ struct dpu_global_state;
   */
  struct dpu_rm {
  	struct dpu_hw_blk *pingpong_blks[PINGPONG_MAX - PINGPONG_0];
+	struct dpu_hw_blk *sspp_blks[SSPP_MAX - SSPP_NONE];
  	struct dpu_hw_blk *mixer_blks[LM_MAX - LM_0];
  	struct dpu_hw_blk *ctl_blks[CTL_MAX - CTL_0];
  	struct dpu_hw_blk *intf_blks[INTF_MAX - INTF_0];
@@ -88,5 +90,9 @@ void dpu_rm_release(struct dpu_global_state *global_state,
  int dpu_rm_get_assigned_resources(struct dpu_rm *rm,
  	struct dpu_global_state *global_state, uint32_t enc_id,
  	enum dpu_hw_blk_type type, struct dpu_hw_blk **blks, int blks_size);
+
+enum dpu_sspp dpu_rm_get_sspp(struct dpu_rm *rm, struct dpu_global_state *global_state, uint32_t plane_id, bool yuv, bool scale);
+void dpu_rm_release_sspp(struct dpu_rm *rm, struct dpu_global_state *global_state, uint32_t plane_id);
+
  #endif /* __DPU_RM_H__ */



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux