Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
Will push upstream in a moment
On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 09:00 -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
> Sparse reports this issue
> wimmgv100.c:39:1: warning: symbol 'gv100_disp_wimm' was not declared. Should
> it be static?
>
> This variable is only used in wimmgv100.c. Single file variables should be
> static.
> So use static as its storage-class specifier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/wimmgv100.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/wimmgv100.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/wimmgv100.c
> index 89d783368b4f..bb4db6351ddf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/wimmgv100.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/wimmgv100.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ gv100_disp_wimm_intr(struct nv50_disp_chan *chan, bool en)
> nvkm_mask(device, 0x611da8, mask, data);
> }
>
> -const struct nv50_disp_chan_func
> +static const struct nv50_disp_chan_func
> gv100_disp_wimm = {
> .init = gv100_disp_dmac_init,
> .fini = gv100_disp_dmac_fini,
--
Cheers,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat
