Hi Dmitry On 4/22/2022 3:37 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 04:59, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 4/21/2022 5:22 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 02:07, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi Dmitry Thanks for the review. One question below. On 4/21/2022 3:40 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:On 21/04/2022 23:48, Abhinav Kumar wrote:Using intf_idx even for writeback interfaces is confusing because intf_idx is of type enum dpu_intf but the index used for writeback is of type enum dpu_wb. In addition, this makes it easier to separately check the availability of the two as its possible that there are boards which don't have any physical display connected but can still work in writeback mode. Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>Looks good, two minor issues bellow. With them fixed, I'd even squash this patch into the corresponding patch of the previous patchset.--- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 62 +++++++++++++----------- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h | 4 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c index 9c12841..054d7e4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c @@ -962,7 +962,6 @@ static void dpu_encoder_virt_atomic_mode_set(struct drm_encoder *drm_enc, struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_dsc[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC]; int num_lm, num_ctl, num_pp, num_dsc; unsigned int dsc_mask = 0; - enum dpu_hw_blk_type blk_type; int i; if (!drm_enc) { @@ -1044,17 +1043,11 @@ static void dpu_encoder_virt_atomic_mode_set(struct drm_encoder *drm_enc, phys->hw_pp = dpu_enc->hw_pp[i]; phys->hw_ctl = to_dpu_hw_ctl(hw_ctl[i]); - if (dpu_encoder_get_intf_mode(&dpu_enc->base) == INTF_MODE_WB_LINE) - blk_type = DPU_HW_BLK_WB; - else - blk_type = DPU_HW_BLK_INTF; + if (phys->intf_idx >= INTF_0 && phys->intf_idx < INTF_MAX) + phys->hw_intf = dpu_rm_get_intf(&dpu_kms->rm, phys->intf_idx); - if (phys->intf_idx >= INTF_0 && phys->intf_idx < INTF_MAX) { - if (blk_type == DPU_HW_BLK_INTF) - phys->hw_intf = dpu_rm_get_intf(&dpu_kms->rm, phys->intf_idx); - else if (blk_type == DPU_HW_BLK_WB) - phys->hw_wb = dpu_rm_get_wb(&dpu_kms->rm, phys->intf_idx); - } + if (phys->wb_idx >= WB_0 && phys->wb_idx < WB_MAX) + phys->hw_wb = dpu_rm_get_wb(&dpu_kms->rm, phys->wb_idx);We also need a check for if (phus->hw_intf && phys->hw_wb) HERESo there is an error if 1) Neither wb NOR intf are present 2) Both wb AND intf are present for the physical encoder? The second check is okay for now to add but considering concurrent writeback then that wouldn't assumption be wrong since both physical and wb interfaces can go with the same encoder?To the same encoder, but not to the same physical encoder. Here we check the phys_enc parameters.Ok got it, let me re-spin this RFC with patches 2 & 3 squashed. Get the acks on them. Then will absorb into WB series and re-post it.Sounds like a good plan!if (!phys->hw_intf && !phys->hw_wb) { DPU_ERROR_ENC(dpu_enc, @@ -1201,7 +1194,7 @@ static void dpu_encoder_virt_disable(struct drm_encoder *drm_enc) mutex_unlock(&dpu_enc->enc_lock); } -static enum dpu_intf dpu_encoder_get_intf_or_wb(struct dpu_mdss_cfg *catalog, +static enum dpu_intf dpu_encoder_get_intf(struct dpu_mdss_cfg *catalog, enum dpu_intf_type type, u32 controller_id) { int i = 0; @@ -1213,16 +1206,28 @@ static enum dpu_intf dpu_encoder_get_intf_or_wb(struct dpu_mdss_cfg *catalog, return catalog->intf[i].id; } } - } else { - for (i = 0; i < catalog->wb_count; i++) { - if (catalog->wb[i].id == controller_id) - return catalog->wb[i].id; - } } return INTF_MAX; } +static enum dpu_wb dpu_encoder_get_wb(struct dpu_mdss_cfg *catalog, + enum dpu_intf_type type, u32 controller_id) +{ + int i = 0; + + if (type != INTF_WB) + goto end; + + for (i = 0; i < catalog->wb_count; i++) { + if (catalog->wb[i].id == controller_id) + return catalog->wb[i].id; + } + +end: + return WB_MAX;I'd return INTF_NONE/WB_NONE if the interface or WB unit was not found.ack, i guess in that case even the places checking the return value of this function need to be changed.Yes, of course.
INTF_NONE/WB_NONE is not of enum dpu_intf or enum dpu_wb, its of type enum dpu_intf_mode
Do we want to add them to dpu_intf/dpu_wb with a -1 value OR leave it as-it-is.
+} + static void dpu_encoder_vblank_callback(struct drm_encoder *drm_enc, struct dpu_encoder_phys *phy_enc) { @@ -2249,18 +2254,21 @@ static int dpu_encoder_setup_display(struct dpu_encoder_virt *dpu_enc, DPU_DEBUG("h_tile_instance %d = %d, split_role %d\n", i, controller_id, phys_params.split_role); - /* - * FIXME: have separate intf_idx and wb_idx to avoid using - * enum dpu_intf type for wb_idx and also to be able to - * not bail out when there is no intf for boards which dont - * have a display connected to them. - * Having a valid wb_idx but not a intf_idx can be a valid - * combination moving forward. - */ - phys_params.intf_idx = dpu_encoder_get_intf_or_wb(dpu_kms->catalog, + phys_params.intf_idx = dpu_encoder_get_intf(dpu_kms->catalog, intf_type, controller_id); - if (phys_params.intf_idx == INTF_MAX) { + + phys_params.wb_idx = dpu_encoder_get_wb(dpu_kms->catalog, + intf_type, controller_id); + /* + * For boards which have no physical displays, having no interface + * is fine because it can still be used with just writeback. + * If we try without a display on a board which uses a DPU in which + * writeback is not supported, then this will still fail as it will not + * find any writeback in the catalog. + */ + if ((phys_params.intf_idx == INTF_MAX) && + (phys_params.wb_idx == WB_MAX)) { DPU_ERROR_ENC(dpu_enc, "could not get intf or wb: type %d, id %d\n", intf_type, controller_id); ret = -EINVAL; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h index 04d037e..f2af07d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ enum dpu_intr_idx { * @split_role: Role to play in a split-panel configuration * @intf_mode: Interface mode * @intf_idx: Interface index on dpu hardware + * @wb_idx: Writeback index on dpu hardware * @enc_spinlock: Virtual-Encoder-Wide Spin Lock for IRQ purposes * @enable_state: Enable state tracking * @vblank_refcount: Reference count of vblank request @@ -209,6 +210,7 @@ struct dpu_encoder_phys { enum dpu_enc_split_role split_role; enum dpu_intf_mode intf_mode; enum dpu_intf intf_idx; + enum dpu_wb wb_idx; spinlock_t *enc_spinlock; enum dpu_enc_enable_state enable_state; atomic_t vblank_refcount; @@ -275,6 +277,7 @@ struct dpu_encoder_phys_cmd { * @parent_ops: Callbacks exposed by the parent to the phys_enc * @split_role: Role to play in a split-panel configuration * @intf_idx: Interface index this phys_enc will control + * @wb_idx: Writeback index this phys_enc will control * @enc_spinlock: Virtual-Encoder-Wide Spin Lock for IRQ purposes */ struct dpu_enc_phys_init_params { @@ -283,6 +286,7 @@ struct dpu_enc_phys_init_params { const struct dpu_encoder_virt_ops *parent_ops; enum dpu_enc_split_role split_role; enum dpu_intf intf_idx; + enum dpu_wb wb_idx; spinlock_t *enc_spinlock; }; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.h index ba82e54..2f34a31 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.h @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static inline struct dpu_hw_intf *dpu_rm_get_intf(struct dpu_rm *rm, enum dpu_in * @rm: DPU Resource Manager handle * @wb_idx: WB index */ -static inline struct dpu_hw_wb *dpu_rm_get_wb(struct dpu_rm *rm, enum dpu_intf wb_idx) +static inline struct dpu_hw_wb *dpu_rm_get_wb(struct dpu_rm *rm, enum dpu_wb wb_idx) { return rm->hw_wb[wb_idx - WB_0]; }
