Hi CK,
Thanks for the reviews.
On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 14:50 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Jason:
>
> On Tue, 2022-04-19 at 17:41 +0800, jason-jh.lin wrote:
> > Add mtk-mutex support for mt8195 vdosys0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> > angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Fei Shao <fshao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c | 87
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > index aaf8fc1abb43..729ee88035ed 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
> > #define MT8183_MUTEX0_MOD0 0x30
> > #define MT8183_MUTEX0_SOF0 0x2c
> >
> > +#define MT8195_DISP_MUTEX0_MOD0 0x30
> > +#define MT8195_DISP_MUTEX0_SOF 0x2c
>
> This is identical to mt8183, so use mt8183 one instead of creating
> new
> one.
>
> Regards,
> CK
>
I'll fix this in the next version.
Regards,
Jason-JH.Lin.
> >
> >
> > +static const struct mtk_mutex_data mt8195_mutex_driver_data = {
> > + .mutex_mod = mt8195_mutex_mod,
> > + .mutex_sof = mt8195_mutex_sof,
> > + .mutex_mod_reg = MT8195_DISP_MUTEX0_MOD0,
> > + .mutex_sof_reg = MT8195_DISP_MUTEX0_SOF,
> > +};
> > +
> >
>
>
--
Jason-JH Lin <jason-jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
