Am 19.04.22 um 23:46 schrieb Gong, Richard:
On 4/14/2022 2:52 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
[Cc: -kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>]
[…]
Am 13.04.22 um 15:00 schrieb Alex Deucher:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 3:43 AM Paul Menzel wrote:
Thank you for sending out v4.
Am 12.04.22 um 23:50 schrieb Richard Gong:
Active State Power Management (ASPM) feature is enabled since
kernel 5.14.
There are some AMD GFX cards (such as WX3200 and RX640) that won't
work
with ASPM-enabled Intel Alder Lake based systems. Using these GFX
cards as
video/display output, Intel Alder Lake based systems will hang
during
suspend/resume.
[Your email program wraps lines in cited text for some reason, making
the citation harder to read.]
I am still not clear, what “hang during suspend/resume” means. I
guess
suspending works fine? During resume (S3 or S0ix?), where does
it hang?
The system is functional, but there are only display problems?
System freeze after suspend/resume.
But you see certain messages still? At what point does it freeze
exactly? In the bug report you posted Linux messages.
The issue was initially reported on one system (Dell Precision
3660
with
BIOS version 0.14.81), but was later confirmed to affect at
least 4
Alder
Lake based systems.
Add extra check to disable ASPM on Intel Alder Lake based systems.
Fixes: 0064b0ce85bb ("drm/amd/pm: enable ASPM by default")
Link:
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Famd%2F-%2Fissues%2F1885&data=05%7C01%7Crichard.gong%40amd.com%7C487aaa63098b462e146a08da230f2319%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637860845178176835%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=3IVldn05qNa2XVp1Lu58SriS8k9mk4U9K9p3F3IYPe0%3D&reserved=0
Thank you Microsoft Outlook for keeping us safe. :(
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
This tag is a little confusing. Maybe clarify that it was for an
issue
in a previous patch iteration?
I did describe in change-list version 3 below, which corrected the
build
error with W=1 option.
It is not good idea to add the description for that to the commit
message, this is why I add descriptions on change-list version 3.
Do as you wish, but the current style is confusing, and readers of the
commit are going to think, the kernel test robot reported the problem
with AMD VI ASICs and Intel Alder Lake systems.
Signed-off-by: Richard Gong <richard.gong@xxxxxxx>
---
v4: s/CONFIG_X86_64/CONFIG_X86
enhanced check logic
v3: s/intel_core_asom_chk/aspm_support_quirk_check
correct build error with W=1 option
v2: correct commit description
move the check from chip family to problematic platform
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c
index 039b90cdc3bc..b33e0a9bee65 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vi.c
@@ -81,6 +81,10 @@
#include "mxgpu_vi.h"
#include "amdgpu_dm.h"
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86)
+#include <asm/intel-family.h>
+#endif
+
#define ixPCIE_LC_L1_PM_SUBSTATE 0x100100C6
#define
PCIE_LC_L1_PM_SUBSTATE__LC_L1_SUBSTATES_OVERRIDE_EN_MASK
0x00000001L
#define PCIE_LC_L1_PM_SUBSTATE__LC_PCI_PM_L1_2_OVERRIDE_MASK
0x00000002L
@@ -1134,13 +1138,24 @@ static void vi_enable_aspm(struct
amdgpu_device *adev)
WREG32_PCIE(ixPCIE_LC_CNTL, data);
}
+static bool aspm_support_quirk_check(void)
+{
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86)) {
+ struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
+
+ return !(c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model ==
INTEL_FAM6_ALDERLAKE);
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static void vi_program_aspm(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
{
u32 data, data1, orig;
bool bL1SS = false;
bool bClkReqSupport = true;
- if (!amdgpu_device_should_use_aspm(adev))
+ if (!amdgpu_device_should_use_aspm(adev) ||
!aspm_support_quirk_check())
return;
Can users still forcefully enable ASPM with the parameter
`amdgpu.aspm`?
As Mario mentioned in a separate reply, we can't forcefully enable
ASPM
with the parameter 'amdgpu.aspm'.
That would be a regression on systems where ASPM used to work. Hmm. I
guess, you could say, there are no such systems.
if (adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU ||
If I remember correctly, there were also newer cards, where ASPM
worked
with Intel Alder Lake, right? Can only the problematic
generations for
WX3200 and RX640 be excluded from ASPM?
This patch only disables it for the generatioaon that was
problematic.
Could that please be made clear in the commit message summary, and
message?
Are you ok with the commit messages below?
Please change the commit message summary. Maybe:
drm/amdgpu: VI: Disable ASPM on Intel Alder Lake based systems
Active State Power Management (ASPM) feature is enabled since
kernel 5.14.
There are some AMD GFX cards (such as WX3200 and RX640) that won't
work
with ASPM-enabled Intel Alder Lake based systems. Using these GFX
cards as
video/display output, Intel Alder Lake based systems will freeze after
suspend/resume.
Something like:
On Intel Alder Lake based systems using ASPM with AMD GFX Volcanic
Islands (VI) cards, like WX3200 and RX640, graphics don’t initialize
when resuming from S0ix(?).
The issue was initially reported on one system (Dell Precision 3660
with
BIOS version 0.14.81), but was later confirmed to affect at least 4
Alder
Lake based systems.
Which ones?
Add extra check to disable ASPM on Intel Alder Lake based systems with
problematic generation GFX cards.
… with the problematic Volcanic Islands GFX cards.
Loosely related, is there a public (or internal issue) to analyze how
to get ASPM working for VI generation devices with Intel Alder Lake?
As Alex mentioned, we need support from Intel. We don't have any
update
on that.
It’d be great to get that fixed properly.
Last thing, please don’t hate me, does Linux log, that ASPM is
disabled?
