On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 09:59 +0800, CK Hu wrote: > Hi, Xinlei: > > On Mon, 2022-04-11 at 10:31 +0800, xinlei.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Old sequence: > > 1. Pull the MIPI signal high > > 2. Delay & Dsi_reset > > 3. Set the dsi timing register > > 4. dsi clk & lanes leave ulp mode and enter hs mode > > > > The sequence after patching is: > > 1. Set the dsi timing register > > 2. Pull the MIPI signal high > > 3. Delay & Dsi_reset > > 4. dsi clk & lanes leave ulp mode and enter hs mode > > You just describe WHAT this patch do, but WHY this patch do? Does > this > patch reorder sequence to follow any spec? > > > > > Fixes: 2dd8075d2185 ("drm/mediatek: mtk_dsi: Use the > > drm_panel_bridge > > API") > > > > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c > > index ccb0511b9cd5..262c027d8c2f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c > > @@ -649,14 +649,14 @@ static int mtk_dsi_poweron(struct mtk_dsi > > *dsi) > > mtk_dsi_reset_engine(dsi); > > mtk_dsi_phy_timconfig(dsi); > > > > - mtk_dsi_rxtx_control(dsi); > > - usleep_range(30, 100); > > - mtk_dsi_reset_dphy(dsi); > > mtk_dsi_ps_control_vact(dsi); > > mtk_dsi_set_vm_cmd(dsi); > > mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(dsi); > > mtk_dsi_set_interrupt_enable(dsi); > > > > + mtk_dsi_rxtx_control(dsi); > > + usleep_range(30, 100); > > + mtk_dsi_reset_dphy(dsi); > > The original sequence is done by patch [1] not the patch in the Fixes > tag. So modify the Fixes tag. > > [1] > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c?h=v5.18-rc2&id=75374fc2c152ef42c45c6bf716743d5f5bb6d24d > > Regards, > CK > > > mtk_dsi_clk_ulp_mode_leave(dsi); > > mtk_dsi_lane0_ulp_mode_leave(dsi); > > mtk_dsi_clk_hs_mode(dsi, 0); > > Hi CK: Thanks for your review! This modification does not violate the spec. The main purpose is to move 2, 3, 4 of the new sequece to the lane_ready function. I will modify this Fixes tag in the next version. Best Regards! xinlei