Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/exynos: Add device tree based discovery support for G2D

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2013/2/4 Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 1 February 2013 18:28, Inki Dae <daeinki@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013. 2. 1. 오후 8:52 Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx> 작성:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: linux-media-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-media-
>>>> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sachin Kamat
>>>> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 8:40 PM
>>>> To: Inki Dae
>>>> Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki; Kukjin Kim; Sylwester Nawrocki; linux-
>>>> media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree-
>>>> discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; patches@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/exynos: Add device tree based discovery
>>>> support for G2D
>>>>
>>>> On 1 February 2013 17:02, Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> How about using like below?
>>>>>        Compatible = ""samsung,exynos4x12-fimg-2d" /* for Exynos4212,
>>>>> Exynos4412  */
>>>>> It looks odd to use "samsung,exynos4212-fimg-2d" saying that this ip is
>>>> for
>>>>> exynos4212 and exynos4412.
>>>>
>>>> AFAIK, compatible strings are not supposed to have any wildcard
>>> characters.
>>>> Compatible string should suggest the first SoC that contained this IP.
>>>> Hence IMO 4212 is OK.
>>>>
>>
>> Oops, one more thing. AFAIK Exynos4210 also has fimg-2d ip. In this case, we should use "samsung,exynos4210-fimg-2d" as comparible string and add it to exynos4210.dtsi?
>
> Exynos4210 has same g2d IP (v3.0) as C110 or V210; so the same
> comptible string will be used for this one too.
>
>> And please check if exynos4212 and 4412 SoCs have same fimg-2d ip. If it's different, we might need to add ip version property or compatible string to each dtsi file to identify the ip version.
>
> AFAIK, they both have the same IP (v4.1).
>

Ok, let's use the below,

For exynos4210 SoC,
compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-g2d"

For exynos4x12 SoCs,
compatible = "samsung,exynos4212-g2d"

For exynos5250, 5410 (In case of Exynos5440, I'm not sure that the SoC
has same ip)
compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-g2d"

To other guys,
The device tree is used by not only v4l2 side but also drm side so we
should reach an arrangement. So please give me ack if you agree to my
opinion. Otherwise please, give me your opinions.

Thanks,
Inki Dae


>>
>> Sorry but give me your opinions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Inki Dae
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Got it. Please post it again.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> With warm regards,
>>>> Sachin
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
>
>
> --
> With warm regards,
> Sachin
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux