The commit 73511edf8b19 ("dma-buf: specify usage while adding fences to
dma_resv obj v7") ported all the DRM drivers to use the newer fence API
that specifies the usage with the enum dma_resv_usage rather than doing
an explicit shared / exclusive distinction.
But the commit didn't do it properly in two callers of the vc4 driver,
leading to build errors.
Fixes: 73511edf8b19 ("dma-buf: specify usage while adding fences to dma_resv obj v7")
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c
index 38550317e025..9eaf304fc20d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c
@@ -546,7 +546,8 @@ vc4_update_bo_seqnos(struct vc4_exec_info *exec, uint64_t seqno)
bo = to_vc4_bo(&exec->bo[i]->base);
bo->seqno = seqno;
- dma_resv_add_fence(bo->base.base.resv, exec->fence);
+ dma_resv_add_fence(bo->base.base.resv, exec->fence,
+ DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ);
}
list_for_each_entry(bo, &exec->unref_list, unref_head) {
@@ -557,7 +558,8 @@ vc4_update_bo_seqnos(struct vc4_exec_info *exec, uint64_t seqno)
bo = to_vc4_bo(&exec->rcl_write_bo[i]->base);
bo->write_seqno = seqno;
- dma_resv_add_excl_fence(bo->base.base.resv, exec->fence);
+ dma_resv_add_fence(bo->base.base.resv, exec->fence,
+ DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE);
}
}
--
2.35.1
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat
