Re: [PATCH 15/15] seqlock: drop seqcount_ww_mutex_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] seqlock: drop seqcount_ww_mutex_t
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 11:26:15 +0200
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>, daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx, intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linaro-mm-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>, Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20220407085946.744568-16-christian.koenig@amd.com>
References: <20220407085946.744568-1-christian.koenig@amd.com> <20220407085946.744568-16-christian.koenig@amd.com>

On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 10:59:46AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Daniel pointed out that this series removes the last user of
> seqcount_ww_mutex_t, so let's drop this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- DMA-resv usage
  - From: Christian König
- [PATCH 15/15] seqlock: drop seqcount_ww_mutex_t
  - From: Christian König

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] drm: sti: fix spelling mistake: rejec -> rejection
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 03/16] dma-buf: specify usage while adding fences to dma_resv obj v6
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 15/15] seqlock: drop seqcount_ww_mutex_t
Next by thread: [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915: drop bo->moving dependency
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux DRI Users] [Linux Intel Graphics] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux