On 31/03/2022 23:08, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
lgtm, I just have a few nits and questions below: Regardless, this is Reviewed-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks!I've sent the updated series with only first three patches for first stage. Only first patch misses the r-b now.
Rest of the comments below.
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 01:55:57PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> Use the i915 exported data in /proc/<pid>/fdinfo to show GPU utilization per DRM client. Example of the output: intel-gpu-top: Intel Tigerlake (Gen12) @ /dev/dri/card0 - 220/ 221 MHz 70% RC6; 0.62/ 7.08 W; 760 irqs/s ENGINES BUSY MI_SEMA MI_WAIT Render/3D 23.06% |██████▊ | 0% 0% Blitter 0.00% | | 0% 0% Video 5.40% |█▋ | 0% 0% VideoEnhance 20.67% |██████ | 0% 0% PID NAME Render/3D Blitter Video VideoEnhance 3082 mpv | || ||▌ ||██ | 3117 neverball |█▉ || || || | 1 systemd |▍ || || || | 2338 gnome-shell | || || || | Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> --- man/intel_gpu_top.rst | 4 + tools/intel_gpu_top.c | 801 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- tools/meson.build | 2 +- 3 files changed, 804 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/man/intel_gpu_top.rst b/man/intel_gpu_top.rst index b3b765b05feb..f4dbfc5b44d9 100644 --- a/man/intel_gpu_top.rst +++ b/man/intel_gpu_top.rst @@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ Supported keys: 'q' Exit from the tool. 'h' Show interactive help.'1' Toggle between aggregated engine class and physical engine mode.+ 'n' Toggle display of numeric client busyness overlay.+ 's' Toggle between sort modes (runtime, total runtime, pid, client id).+ 'i' Toggle display of clients which used no GPU time. + 'H' Toggle between per PID aggregation and individual clients. DEVICE SELECTION ================ diff --git a/tools/intel_gpu_top.c b/tools/intel_gpu_top.c index bc11fce2bb1e..73815cdea8aa 100644 --- a/tools/intel_gpu_top.c +++ b/tools/intel_gpu_top.c @@ -43,8 +43,10 @@ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <termios.h> +#include <sys/sysmacros.h> #include "igt_perf.h" +#include "igt_drm_fdinfo.h" #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr)/sizeof(arr[0]))@@ -311,7 +313,8 @@ static int engine_cmp(const void *__a, const void *__b)return a->instance - b->instance; } -#define is_igpu_pci(x) (strcmp(x, "0000:00:02.0") == 0) +#define IGPU_PCI "0000:00:02.0" +#define is_igpu_pci(x) (strcmp(x, IGPU_PCI) == 0) #define is_igpu(x) (strcmp(x, "i915") == 0) static struct engines *discover_engines(char *device) @@ -635,6 +638,547 @@ static void pmu_sample(struct engines *engines) } } +enum client_status { + FREE = 0, /* mbz */ + ALIVE, + PROBE +}; + +struct clients; + +struct client { + struct clients *clients; + + enum client_status status; + unsigned int id; + unsigned int pid; + char name[24]; + char print_name[24]; + unsigned int samples; + unsigned long total_runtime; + unsigned long last_runtime; + unsigned long *val; + uint64_t *last; +}; + +struct clients { + unsigned int num_clients; + unsigned int active_clients; + + unsigned int num_classes; + struct engine_class *class; + + char pci_slot[64]; + + struct client *client; +}; + +#define for_each_client(clients, c, tmp) \ + for ((tmp) = (clients)->num_clients, c = (clients)->client; \ + (tmp > 0); (tmp)--, (c)++) + +static struct clients *init_clients(const char *pci_slot) +{ + struct clients *clients; + + clients = malloc(sizeof(*clients)); + if (!clients) + return NULL; + + memset(clients, 0, sizeof(*clients)); + + strncpy(clients->pci_slot, pci_slot, sizeof(clients->pci_slot)); + + return clients; +} + +static struct client *+find_client(struct clients *clients, enum client_status status, unsigned int id)+{ + unsigned int start, num; + struct client *c; ++ start = status == FREE ? clients->active_clients : 0; /* Free block at the end. */+ num = clients->num_clients - start; + + for (c = &clients->client[start]; num; c++, num--) { + if (status != c->status) + continue; + + if (status == FREE || c->id == id) + return c; + } + + return NULL; +} + +static void+update_client(struct client *c, unsigned int pid, char *name, uint64_t val[16])+{ + unsigned int i; + + if (c->pid != pid) + c->pid = pid; + + if (strcmp(c->name, name)) { + char *p; + + strncpy(c->name, name, sizeof(c->name) - 1); + strncpy(c->print_name, name, sizeof(c->print_name) - 1); + + p = c->print_name; + while (*p) { + if (!isprint(*p)) + *p = '*'; + p++; + } + } + + c->last_runtime = 0; + c->total_runtime = 0; +assert(c->clients->num_classes <= 16);
Done in a slightly different way - since I've changed the function signature to take struct drm_client_fdinfo I used ARRAY_SIZE on the busy array inside it.
+ for (i = 0; i < c->clients->num_classes; i++) { + if (val[i] < c->last[i]) + continue; /* It will catch up soon. */ + + c->total_runtime += val[i];As far as busyness is concerned c->total_runtime += val[i] should be it.+ c->val[i] = val[i] - c->last[i]; + c->last_runtime += c->val[i]; + c->last[i] = val[i];Can you describe what these 3 lines are doing?
For different sorting modes I need to be able to put at the top the most active client regardless of which engines.
c->total_runtime is cumulative across engine usage.c->last_runtime is usage during the last display period, also all engines added together.
c->last[] is simply tracking the delta per engine, from last display period to current, so relative utilisation in the last display period can be displayed.
+ } + + c->samples++; + c->status = ALIVE; +} + +static void +add_client(struct clients *clients, unsigned int id, unsigned int pid, + char *name, uint64_t busy[16]) +{ + struct client *c; + + assert(!find_client(clients, ALIVE, id)); + + c = find_client(clients, FREE, 0); + if (!c) { + unsigned int idx = clients->num_clients; + + clients->num_clients += (clients->num_clients + 2) / 2; + clients->client = realloc(clients->client, + clients->num_clients * sizeof(*c)); + assert(clients->client); + + c = &clients->client[idx]; + memset(c, 0, (clients->num_clients - idx) * sizeof(*c)); + } + + c->id = id; + c->clients = clients; + c->val = calloc(clients->num_classes, sizeof(c->val)); + c->last = calloc(clients->num_classes, sizeof(c->last)); + assert(c->val && c->last); + + update_client(c, pid, name, busy); +} + +static void free_client(struct client *c) +{ + free(c->val); + free(c->last); + memset(c, 0, sizeof(*c)); +} + +static int client_last_cmp(const void *_a, const void *_b) +{ + const struct client *a = _a; + const struct client *b = _b; + long tot_a, tot_b; + + /*+ * Sort clients in descending order of runtime in the previous sampling + * period for active ones, followed by inactive. Tie-breaker is client+ * id. + */ + + tot_a = a->status == ALIVE ? a->last_runtime : -1; + tot_b = b->status == ALIVE ? b->last_runtime : -1; + + tot_b -= tot_a; + if (tot_b > 0) + return 1; + if (tot_b < 0) + return -1; + + return (int)b->id - a->id;nit: the compare functions could use a single if, if you agree on just returning tot_b.if (!tot_b) return (int)b->id - a->id; return tot_b;
I chose not to touch this for now. It gets refactored later in the series and there are signed extending issues (compare function works with int result while my internal data are alongs) to think about so I'd rather not need to re-debug it.
+} + +static int client_total_cmp(const void *_a, const void *_b) +{ + const struct client *a = _a; + const struct client *b = _b; + long tot_a, tot_b; + + tot_a = a->status == ALIVE ? a->total_runtime : -1; + tot_b = b->status == ALIVE ? b->total_runtime : -1; + + tot_b -= tot_a; + if (tot_b > 0) + return 1; + if (tot_b < 0) + return -1; + + return (int)b->id - a->id; +} + +static int client_id_cmp(const void *_a, const void *_b) +{ + const struct client *a = _a; + const struct client *b = _b; + int id_a, id_b; + + id_a = a->status == ALIVE ? a->id : -1; + id_b = b->status == ALIVE ? b->id : -1; + + id_b -= id_a; + if (id_b > 0) + return 1; + if (id_b < 0) + return -1; + + return (int)b->id - a->id; +} + +static int client_pid_cmp(const void *_a, const void *_b) +{ + const struct client *a = _a; + const struct client *b = _b; + int pid_a, pid_b; + + pid_a = a->status == ALIVE ? a->pid : INT_MAX; + pid_b = b->status == ALIVE ? b->pid : INT_MAX; + + pid_b -= pid_a; + if (pid_b > 0) + return -1; + if (pid_b < 0) + return 1; + + return (int)a->id - b->id; +} + +static int (*client_cmp)(const void *, const void *) = client_last_cmp; + +static struct clients *sort_clients(struct clients *clients, + int (*cmp)(const void *, const void *)) +{ + unsigned int active, free; + struct client *c; + int tmp; + + if (!clients) + return clients; ++ qsort(clients->client, clients->num_clients, sizeof(*clients->client),+ cmp); + + /* Trim excessive array space. */ + active = 0; + for_each_client(clients, c, tmp) { + if (c->status != ALIVE) + break; /* Active clients are first in the array. */ + active++; + } + + clients->active_clients = active; + + free = clients->num_clients - active; + if (free > clients->num_clients / 2) { + active = clients->num_clients - free / 2; + if (active != clients->num_clients) { + clients->num_clients = active; + clients->client = realloc(clients->client, + clients->num_clients * + sizeof(*c)); + } + } + + return clients; +} + +static bool aggregate_pids = true; + +static struct clients *display_clients(struct clients *clients) +{ + struct client *ac, *c, *cp = NULL; + struct clients *aggregated; + int tmp, num = 0; + + if (!aggregate_pids) + goto out; + + /* Sort by pid first to make it easy to aggregate while walking. */ + sort_clients(clients, client_pid_cmp); + + aggregated = calloc(1, sizeof(*clients)); + assert(aggregated); + + ac = calloc(clients->num_clients, sizeof(*c)); + assert(ac); + + aggregated->num_classes = clients->num_classes; + aggregated->class = clients->class; + aggregated->client = ac; + + for_each_client(clients, c, tmp) { + unsigned int i; + + if (c->status == FREE) + break; + + assert(c->status == ALIVE); + + if ((cp && c->pid != cp->pid) || !cp) {same as: if (!cp || c->pid != cp->pid), fine either ways
Yep thanks, done.
+ ac = &aggregated->client[num++]; + + /* New pid. */ + ac->clients = aggregated; + ac->status = ALIVE; + ac->id = -c->pid; + ac->pid = c->pid; + strcpy(ac->name, c->name); + strcpy(ac->print_name, c->print_name); + ac->val = calloc(clients->num_classes, + sizeof(ac->val[0])); + assert(ac->val); + ac->samples = 1; + } + + cp = c; + + if (c->samples < 2) + continue; + + ac->samples = 2; /* All what matters for display. */ + ac->total_runtime += c->total_runtime; + ac->last_runtime += c->last_runtime; + + for (i = 0; i < clients->num_classes; i++) + ac->val[i] += c->val[i]; + } + + aggregated->num_clients = num; + aggregated->active_clients = num; + + clients = aggregated; + +out: + return sort_clients(clients, client_cmp); +} + +static void free_clients(struct clients *clients) +{ + struct client *c; + unsigned int tmp; + + for_each_client(clients, c, tmp) { + free(c->val); + free(c->last); + } + + free(clients->client); + free(clients); +} + +static bool is_drm_fd(DIR *fd_dir, const char *name) +{ + struct stat stat; + int ret; + + ret = fstatat(dirfd(fd_dir), name, &stat, 0); + + return ret == 0 && + (stat.st_mode & S_IFMT) == S_IFCHR && + major(stat.st_rdev) == 226; +} ++static bool get_task_name(const char *buffer, char *out, unsigned long sz)+{ + char *s = index(buffer, '('); + char *e = rindex(buffer, ')'); + unsigned int len; + + if (!s || !e) + return false;maybe assert(e > s);
Done.
+ + len = --e - ++s + 1;len = e - ++s;
Not sure which one is more readable, depends how you think about it I guess. But done nevertheless.
Regards, Tvrtko
