On 4/1/22 01:52, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 16:48:23 +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
MIPI-DSI devices, if they are controlled through the bus itself, have to
be described as a child node of the controller they are attached to.
Thus, there's no requirement on the controller having an OF-Graph output
port to model the data stream: it's assumed that it would go from the
parent to the child.
However, some bridges controlled through the DSI bus still require an
input OF-Graph port, thus requiring a controller with an OF-Graph output
port. This prevents those bridges from being used with the controllers
that do not have one without any particular reason to.
Let's drop that requirement.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/chipone,icn6211.yaml | 1 -
.../devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/toshiba,tc358762.yaml | 1 -
2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
I tend to agree with port@0 not being needed and really like
consistency.
The consistent thing to do would be to always use port@0 and OF graph, no ?
