Re: [PATCH 07/12] drm/edid: split drm_edid_block_valid() to check and act parts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 31 Mar 2022, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> -
>> -		if (edid->revision > 4)
>> -			DRM_DEBUG("EDID minor > 4, assuming backward compatibility\n");
>
> This debug message seems to disappear. Intentional?

Intentional, but failed to mention it in the commit message.

Do we want to keep it? With my new approach, it basically means another
valid return value that's distinct from just ok.


BR,
Jani.



-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux