Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: add dma_fence_unwrap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 25.03.22 um 16:25 schrieb Ville Syrjälä:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 12:02:43PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
Add a general purpose helper to deep dive into dma_fence_chain/dma_fence_array
structures and iterate over all the fences in them.

This is useful when we need to flatten out all fences in those structures.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
One of the dma-buf patches took down Intel CI. Looks like every
machine oopses in some sync_file thing now:
<1>[  260.470008] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000010
<1>[  260.470020] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
<1>[  260.470025] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
<6>[  260.470030] PGD 0 P4D 0
<4>[  260.470035] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
<4>[  260.470040] CPU: 0 PID: 5306 Comm: core_hotunplug Not tainted 5.17.0-CI-CI_DRM_11405+ #1
<4>[  260.470049] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Jasper Lake Client Platform/Jasperlake DDR4 SODIMM RVP, BIOS JSLSFWI1.R00.2385.D02.2010160831 10/16/2020
<4>[  260.470058] RIP: 0010:dma_fence_array_first+0x19/0x20
<4>[  260.470068] Code: c3 31 c0 c3 0f 1f 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 85 ff 74 18 48 89 f8 48 81 7f 08 60 7f 0a 82 75 0d 48 8b 87 88 00 00 00 <48> 8b 00 c3 31 c0 c3 31 c0 48 85 ff 74 20 48 81 7f 08 60 7f 0a 82
<4>[  260.470080] RSP: 0018:ffffc900009a7e40 EFLAGS: 00010246
<4>[  260.470086] RAX: 0000000000000010 RBX: 000000000000000b RCX: 0000000000000000
<4>[  260.470100] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff888109a796b8
<4>[  260.470106] RBP: ffff888109a796b8 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000
<4>[  260.470112] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff888109a796b8
<4>[  260.470118] R13: 00007ffc5d21f750 R14: ffff8881065be340 R15: 0000000000000000
<4>[  260.470124] FS:  00007f08bd6d04c0(0000) GS:ffff88885fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
<4>[  260.470131] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
<4>[  260.470137] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 000000010e690000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
<4>[  260.470143] Call Trace:
<4>[  260.470146]  <TASK>
<4>[  260.470149]  sync_file_ioctl+0x2eb/0xc90
<4>[  260.470157]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xa0
<4>[  260.470164]  do_syscall_64+0x37/0xb0
<4>[  260.470170]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
<4>[  260.470176] RIP: 0033:0x7f08c047750b
<4>[  260.470182] Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 85 39 0d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 55 39 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
<4>[  260.470195] RSP: 002b:00007ffc5d21f748 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
<4>[  260.470202] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000000a RCX: 00007f08c047750b
<4>[  260.470208] RDX: 00007ffc5d21f750 RSI: 00000000c0303e03 RDI: 000000000000000a
<4>[  260.470214] RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffc5d21ebb0
<4>[  260.470219] R10: 00007f08c0a6170e R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
<4>[  260.470225] R13: 00007ffc5d21f840 R14: 000055e80d13d1b0 R15: 0000000000000009
<4>[  260.470233]  </TASK>
<4>[  260.470239] Modules linked in: vgem drm_shmem_helper fuse snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic ledtrig_audio i915 snd_hda_intel snd_intel_dspcfg snd_hda_codec x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul snd_hwdep ghash_clmulni_intel snd_hda_core ttm drm_buddy drm_dp_helper snd_pcm drm_kms_helper i2c_i801 r8169 i2c_smbus syscopyarea realtek sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops prime_numbers intel_lpss_pci
<4>[  260.470289] CR2: 0000000000000010
<4>[  260.470312] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Can we please start running dma-buf stuff through CI so this
kind of stuff doesn't keep happening so often?

I've did ran it through CI, but since the most recent patches didn't applied on top of drm-tip for some reason the result was just garbage.

Going to take a look into this immediately, looks like something which I've seen during development maybe the wrong patch was pushed to drm-misc-next-fixes or something like this.

Thanks for letting me know,
Christian.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux