Re: [PATCH 04/23] RDMA: use dma_resv_wait() instead of extracting the fence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 17:32, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 02:22:01PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 02:58:37PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > > Use dma_resv_wait() instead of extracting the exclusive fence and
> > > waiting on it manually.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Jason, can you ack this for merging through drm trees please?
>
> Sure, it looks trivial, but I didn't see the whole series:
>
> Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>

The entire series reworks how dma_resv stores fences (and what exactly
the mean), which is why we need to get users away from some of these
low-level accessors and towards functions at a slightly higher level.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux