Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/rcar_du: use drm_encoder pointer for drm_writeback_connector

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Laurent

Thank you for your inputs.

I liked all the suggestions, hence I have incorporated those and pushed a v2.

Thanks

Abhinav

On 3/13/2022 7:50 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Abhinav

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 09:47:17AM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 3/10/2022 11:28 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 05:49:59PM -0800, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
Make changes to rcar_du driver to start using drm_encoder pointer
for drm_writeback_connector.

Co-developed-by: Kandpal Suraj <suraj.kandpal@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_writeback.c | 3 ++-
   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_writeback.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_writeback.c
index c79d125..03930ad 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_writeback.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_writeback.c
@@ -200,7 +200,8 @@ int rcar_du_writeback_init(struct rcar_du_device *rcdu,
   {
   	struct drm_writeback_connector *wb_conn = &rcrtc->writeback;
- wb_conn->encoder.possible_crtcs = 1 << drm_crtc_index(&rcrtc->crtc);
+	wb_conn->encoder = kzalloc(sizeof(struct drm_encoder), GFP_KERNEL);

Where is this freed ?

You are right, this isnt. Looking more into this, it seems like moving
the allocation of encoder to drm_writeback.c for cases which dont pass a
real encoder is much better so that I will not have to add alloc() /
free() code for all the vendor driver changes which is what I originally
thought in my RFC but changed my mind because of below.

Yes, I think that would be better indeed. You could even skip the
dynamic allocation, you could have

	struct drm_encoder *encoder;
	struct drm_encoder internal_encoder;

in drm_writeback_connector, and set

	wb->encoder = &wb->internal_encoder;

when the user doesn't pass an encoder.

+	wb_conn->encoder->possible_crtcs = 1 << drm_crtc_index(&rcrtc->crtc);

Do you think we can just move usage of wb_conn->encoder->possible_crtcs
just right after drm_writeback_connector_init() so that it wont crash?

How about adding a possible_crtcs argument to
drm_writeback_connector_init() (to cover existing use cases), and adding
a new drm_writeback_connector_init_with_encoder() that would get an
encoder pointer (and expect possible_crtcs, as well as all the other
appropriate encoder fields, having been initialized) ?

198 int rcar_du_writeback_init(struct rcar_du_device *rcdu,
199 			   struct rcar_du_crtc *rcrtc)
200 {
201 	struct drm_writeback_connector *wb_conn = &rcrtc->writeback;
202
203 	wb_conn->encoder.possible_crtcs = 1 << drm_crtc_index(&rcrtc->crtc);
204 	drm_connector_helper_add(&wb_conn->base,
205 				 &rcar_du_wb_conn_helper_funcs);
206
207 	return drm_writeback_connector_init(&rcdu->ddev, wb_conn,
208 					    &rcar_du_wb_conn_funcs,
209 					    &rcar_du_wb_enc_helper_funcs,
210 					    writeback_formats,
211 					    ARRAY_SIZE(writeback_formats));
212 }

   	drm_connector_helper_add(&wb_conn->base,
   				 &rcar_du_wb_conn_helper_funcs);




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux