Re: [PATCH 8/9] drm/gem-shmem: Implement fbdev dumb buffer and mmap helpers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/3/22 21:58, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Implement struct drm_driver.dumb_create_fbdev for GEM SHMEM. The
> created buffer object returned by this function implements deferred
> I/O for its mmap operation.
> 
> Add this feature to a number of drivers that use GEM SHMEM helpers
> as shadow planes over their regular video memory. The new macro
> DRM_GEM_SHMEM_DRIVER_OPS_WITH_SHADOW_PLANES sets the regular GEM
> functions and dumb_create_fbdev in struct drm_driver. Fbdev emulation
> on these drivers will now mmap the GEM SHMEM pages directly with
> deferred I/O without an intermediate shadow buffer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx>
> ---

[snip]

> @@ -49,8 +50,20 @@ static const struct drm_gem_object_funcs drm_gem_shmem_funcs = {
>  	.vm_ops = &drm_gem_shmem_vm_ops,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct drm_gem_object_funcs drm_gem_shmem_funcs_fbdev = {
> +	.free = drm_gem_shmem_object_free,
> +	.print_info = drm_gem_shmem_object_print_info,
> +	.pin = drm_gem_shmem_object_pin,
> +	.unpin = drm_gem_shmem_object_unpin,
> +	.get_sg_table = drm_gem_shmem_object_get_sg_table,
> +	.vmap = drm_gem_shmem_object_vmap,
> +	.vunmap = drm_gem_shmem_object_vunmap,
> +	.mmap = drm_gem_shmem_object_mmap_fbdev,
> +	.vm_ops = &drm_gem_shmem_vm_ops_fbdev,

The drm_gem_shmem_funcs_fbdev is the same than drm_gem_shmem_funcs but
.mmap and .vm_ops callbacks. Maybe adding a macro to declare these two
struct drm_gem_object_funcs could make easier to maintain it long term ?

> +};
> +
>  static struct drm_gem_shmem_object *
> -__drm_gem_shmem_create(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, bool private)
> +__drm_gem_shmem_create(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, bool private, bool fbdev)
>  {
>  	struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
>  	struct drm_gem_object *obj;
> @@ -70,8 +83,12 @@ __drm_gem_shmem_create(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, bool private)
>  		obj = &shmem->base;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!obj->funcs)
> -		obj->funcs = &drm_gem_shmem_funcs;
> +	if (!obj->funcs) {
> +		if (fbdev)

Same question than in patch #6, maybe

                if (defined(CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION) && fbdev) ?

[snip]

> + */
> +int drm_gem_shmem_dumb_create_fbdev(struct drm_file *file, struct drm_device *dev,
> +				    struct drm_mode_create_dumb *args)
> +{
> +#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION)
> +	return __drm_gem_shmem_dumb_create(file, dev, true, args);
> +#else
> +	return -ENOSYS;
> +#endif
> +}

I believe the correct errno code here should be -ENOTSUPP.

[snip]

> +	/* We don't use vmf->pgoff since that has the fake offset */
> +	page_offset = (vmf->address - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;

I see this (vmf->address - vma->vm_start) calculation in many places of
this series. Maybe we could add a macro to calculate the offset instead ?

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux