On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 07:13:30PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hello Xin, > > (Question for Rob below, and I'm afraid this is urgent as we need to > merge a fix in v5.17). > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 11:19:03AM +0800, Xin Ji wrote: > > The basic anx7625 driver only support MIPI DSI rx signal input. > > This patch add MIPI DPI rx input configuration support, after apply > > this patch, the driver can support DSI rx or DPI rx by adding > > 'bus-type' in DT. > > > > Reviewed-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Xin Ji <xji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c | 247 ++++++++++++++++------ > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.h | 18 +- > > 2 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c > > index f48e91134c20..f7c3386c8929 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c [...] > > static int anx7625_parse_dt(struct device *dev, > > struct anx7625_platform_data *pdata) > > { > > - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > > + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node, *ep0; > > struct drm_panel *panel; > > int ret; > > + int bus_type, mipi_lanes; > > + > > + anx7625_get_swing_setting(dev, pdata); > > > > + pdata->is_dpi = 1; /* default dpi mode */ > > pdata->mipi_host_node = of_graph_get_remote_node(np, 0, 0); > > if (!pdata->mipi_host_node) { > > DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "fail to get internal panel.\n"); > > return -ENODEV; > > } > > > > - DRM_DEV_DEBUG_DRIVER(dev, "found dsi host node.\n"); > > + bus_type = V4L2_FWNODE_BUS_TYPE_PARALLEL; > > + mipi_lanes = MAX_LANES_SUPPORT; > > + ep0 = of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(np, 0, 0); > > + if (ep0) { > > + if (of_property_read_u32(ep0, "bus-type", &bus_type)) > > + bus_type = 0; > > + > > + mipi_lanes = of_property_count_u32_elems(ep0, "data-lanes"); > > + } > > + > > + if (bus_type == V4L2_FWNODE_BUS_TYPE_PARALLEL) /* bus type is Parallel(DSI) */ > > This is not correct *at all*. V4L2_FWNODE_BUS_TYPE_PARALLEL has nothing > to do with DSI. DSI stands for Digital *Serial* Interface. If anything, > the V4L2_FWNODE_BUS_TYPE_PARALLEL type would map better to DPI, even if > it's not an exact match. > > This patch has landed in v5.17-rc1, along with the corresponding > bindings. As DT bindings are an ABI, we should really fix this before > v5.17 is released. There is no DSI bus types defined in DT, and adding > one as a fix so late in the v5.17-rc cycle seems a bit of a stretch to > me (unless Rob disagrees). > > It would seem best to revert this series and the corresponding bindings, > and retry in v5.18. There is a DT patch using this property that is already queued up for 5.17 in the soc tree: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220214200507.2500693-1-nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ merged here: http://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/32568ae37596b529628ac09b875f4874e614f63f We will need to revert that one as well. ChenYu