On 2022-02-28 10:10:48 [+0000], Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > Hi, Hi, > Could you paste a link to the queue of i915 patches pending for a quick > overview of how much work there is and in what areas? Last post to the list: https://https://lkml.kernel.org/r/.kernel.org/all/20211214140301.520464-1-bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ or if you look at the DRM section in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git/tree/patches/series?h=v5.17-rc6-rt10-patches#n156 you see: 0003-drm-i915-Use-preempt_disable-enable_rt-where-recomme.patch 0004-drm-i915-Don-t-disable-interrupts-on-PREEMPT_RT-duri.patch 0005-drm-i915-Don-t-check-for-atomic-context-on-PREEMPT_R.patch 0006-drm-i915-Disable-tracing-points-on-PREEMPT_RT.patch 0007-drm-i915-skip-DRM_I915_LOW_LEVEL_TRACEPOINTS-with-NO.patch 0008-drm-i915-gt-Queue-and-wait-for-the-irq_work-item.patch 0009-drm-i915-gt-Use-spin_lock_irq-instead-of-local_irq_d.patch 0010-drm-i915-Drop-the-irqs_disabled-check.patch Revert-drm-i915-Depend-on-PREEMPT_RT.patch and you could view them from https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git/tree/patches?h=v5.17-rc6-rt10-patches > Also, I assume due absence of ARCH_SUPPORTS_RT being defined by any arch, > that something more is not yet ready? Correct. Looking at what I have queued for the next merge window I have less than 20 patches (excluding i915 and printk) before ARCH_SUPPORTS_RT can be enabled for x86-64. > Regards, > > Tvrtko Sebastian
