Re: [PATCH 5/9] lib/ref_tracker: improve allocation flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 2:28 AM Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > git log --oneline 5740d0689096..4d449bdc5b26 --no-merges -- lib/ref_tracker.c
> > c2d1e3df4af59261777b39c2e47476acd4d1cbeb ref_tracker: remove
> > filter_irq_stacks() call
> > 8fd5522f44dcd7f05454ddc4f16d0f821b676cd9 ref_tracker: add a count of
> > untracked references
> > e3ececfe668facd87d920b608349a32607060e66 ref_tracker: implement
> > use-after-free detection
>
>
> So I will cherry-pick these patches into next version of patchset, with
> "NO MERGE" annotation (to allow testing), and if my ref_track patches
> will be accepted then they can go via net-dev tree and intel patches
> will wait till update of drm-tip.
> Is this scenario OK?

One possibility would be to split your patch series in two, to merge
the ref_tracker changes directly in net-next asap.

But I have no strong opinion, maybe Jakub/David have some guidance.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux