Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/dg2: Enable 5th display

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:02:31AM -0800, Shankar, Uma wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: C, Ramalingam <ramalingam.c@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 11:22 AM
> > To: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; dri-devel <dri-
> > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Shankar, Uma
> > <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx>; Roper, Matthew D <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>;
> > Dhanavanthri, Swathi <swathi.dhanavanthri@xxxxxxxxx>; De Marchi, Lucas
> > <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>; Souza, Jose <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>; C, Ramalingam
> > <ramalingam.c@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/dg2: Enable 5th display
> > 
> > From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > DG2 supports a 5th display output which the hardware refers to as "TC1,"
> > even though it isn't a Type-C output.  This behaves similarly to the TC1 on past
> > platforms with just a couple minor differences:
> > 
> >  * DG2's TC1 bit in SDEISR is at bit 25 rather than 24 as it is on
> >    ICP/TGP/ADP.
> >  * DG2 doesn't need the hpd inversion setting that we had to use on DG1
> > 
> > Cc: Swathi Dhanavanthri <swathi.dhanavanthri@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c            |  5 ++++-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h            |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
> > index 6ce8c10fe975..2fad03250661 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
> > @@ -98,11 +98,21 @@ static const struct gmbus_pin gmbus_pins_dg1[] = {
> >  	[GMBUS_PIN_4_CNP] = { "dpd", GPIOE },
> >  };
> > 
> > +static const struct gmbus_pin gmbus_pins_dg2[] = {
> > +	[GMBUS_PIN_1_BXT] = { "dpa", GPIOB },
> > +	[GMBUS_PIN_2_BXT] = { "dpb", GPIOC },
> > +	[GMBUS_PIN_3_BXT] = { "dpc", GPIOD },
> > +	[GMBUS_PIN_4_CNP] = { "dpd", GPIOE },
> > +	[GMBUS_PIN_9_TC1_ICP] = { "tc1", GPIOJ }, };
> > +
> >  /* pin is expected to be valid */
> >  static const struct gmbus_pin *get_gmbus_pin(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  					     unsigned int pin)
> >  {
> > -	if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_DG1)
> > +	if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_DG2)
> > +		return &gmbus_pins_dg2[pin];
> > +	else if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_DG1)
> >  		return &gmbus_pins_dg1[pin];
> >  	else if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_ICP)
> >  		return &gmbus_pins_icp[pin];
> > @@ -123,7 +133,9 @@ bool intel_gmbus_is_valid_pin(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv,  {
> >  	unsigned int size;
> > 
> > -	if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_DG1)
> > +	if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_DG2)
> > +		size = ARRAY_SIZE(gmbus_pins_dg2);
> > +	else if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_DG1)
> >  		size = ARRAY_SIZE(gmbus_pins_dg1);
> >  	else if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_ICP)
> >  		size = ARRAY_SIZE(gmbus_pins_icp);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c index
> > fdd568ba4a16..4d81063b128c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ static const u32 hpd_sde_dg1[HPD_NUM_PINS] = {
> >  	[HPD_PORT_B] = SDE_DDI_HOTPLUG_ICP(HPD_PORT_B),
> >  	[HPD_PORT_C] = SDE_DDI_HOTPLUG_ICP(HPD_PORT_C),
> >  	[HPD_PORT_D] = SDE_DDI_HOTPLUG_ICP(HPD_PORT_D),
> > +	[HPD_PORT_TC1] = SDE_TC_HOTPLUG_DG2(HPD_PORT_TC1),
> 
> Not sure if this applies to DG1, the 5th TC1 port is only for DG2.  Should we not have a separate
> DG2 struct. Can you please clarify to help understand.

It's fine to add this to the DG1 structure since it's just a mapping
table.  DG1 will never use TC1 as an input into the table, but there
aren't any conflicting mappings between DG1/DG2 so we can use the same
table for both.


Matt

> 
> Regards,
> Uma Shankar
> 
> >  };
> > 
> >  static void intel_hpd_init_pins(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) @@ -4424,7
> > +4425,9 @@ void intel_irq_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  		if (I915_HAS_HOTPLUG(dev_priv))
> >  			dev_priv->hotplug_funcs = &i915_hpd_funcs;
> >  	} else {
> > -		if (HAS_PCH_DG1(dev_priv))
> > +		if (HAS_PCH_DG2(dev_priv))
> > +			dev_priv->hotplug_funcs = &icp_hpd_funcs;
> > +		else if (HAS_PCH_DG1(dev_priv))
> >  			dev_priv->hotplug_funcs = &dg1_hpd_funcs;
> >  		else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
> >  			dev_priv->hotplug_funcs = &gen11_hpd_funcs; diff --git
> > a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index
> > 4ea1713e6b60..4d12abb2d7ff 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -6182,6 +6182,7 @@
> >  /* south display engine interrupt: ICP/TGP */
> >  #define SDE_GMBUS_ICP			(1 << 23)
> >  #define SDE_TC_HOTPLUG_ICP(hpd_pin)	REG_BIT(24 +
> > _HPD_PIN_TC(hpd_pin))
> > +#define SDE_TC_HOTPLUG_DG2(hpd_pin)	REG_BIT(25 +
> > _HPD_PIN_TC(hpd_pin)) /* sigh */
> >  #define SDE_DDI_HOTPLUG_ICP(hpd_pin)	REG_BIT(16 +
> > _HPD_PIN_DDI(hpd_pin))
> >  #define SDE_DDI_HOTPLUG_MASK_ICP	(SDE_DDI_HOTPLUG_ICP(HPD_PORT_D) | \
> >  					 SDE_DDI_HOTPLUG_ICP(HPD_PORT_C) | \
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> 

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux