> Maybe it does not look like, but this is actually a v2. Nick was asked
> to change the naming for the nodes already in v1. Unfortunately it did
> not happen, so we have vuart, spifi, vic and more.
> It is a waste of reviewers' time to ask them to perform the same review
> twice or to ignore their comments.
Hi Krysztof,
Accept our apologies if you think you lose your time, it is clearly not our
intent.
This is the first time that we (I mean the team) introduce a new arch into
the linux kernel and I must admit that we had hard time to understand
from which angle we needed to start.
I will probably write a Documentation afterward, as it is easy to find doc
on how to introduce a patch or a driver, but not when you want to
introduce a new chip.
We are trying to do our best, and clearly want to follow all of your inputs.
Mistakes happen and they are clearly not intentional and not driven in
a way to make you lose your time.
Helping others, and teaching something new is definitely a way to
optimize your time and this is what you are currently doing with us.
We appreciate it and hope you will too.
vejmarie
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
