On 1/25/22 20:35, Robert Beckett wrote:
add test to check handling of misaligned offsets and sizes
v4:
* remove spurious blank lines
* explicitly cast intel_region_id to intel_memory_type in misaligned_pin
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Robert Beckett <bob.beckett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 128 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
index b80788a2b7f9..f082b5ff3b5e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@ -22,10 +22,12 @@
*
*/
+#include "gt/intel_gtt.h"
#include <linux/list_sort.h>
#include <linux/prime_numbers.h>
#include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
+#include "gem/i915_gem_region.h"
#include "gem/selftests/mock_context.h"
#include "gt/intel_context.h"
#include "gt/intel_gpu_commands.h"
@@ -1067,6 +1069,120 @@ static int shrink_boom(struct i915_address_space *vm,
return err;
}
+static int misaligned_case(struct i915_address_space *vm, struct intel_memory_region *mr,
+ u64 addr, u64 size, unsigned long flags)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+ struct i915_vma *vma;
+ int err = 0;
+ u64 expected_vma_size, expected_node_size;
+
+ obj = i915_gem_object_create_region(mr, size, 0, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(obj))
+ return PTR_ERR(obj);
+
+ vma = i915_vma_instance(obj, vm, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(vma);
+ goto err_put;
+ }
+
+ err = i915_vma_pin(vma, 0, 0, addr | flags);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_put;
+ i915_vma_unpin(vma);
+
+ if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node)) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_put;
+ }
+
+ if (i915_vma_misplaced(vma, 0, 0, addr | flags)) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_put;
+ }
+
+ expected_vma_size = round_up(size, 1 << (ffs(vma->resource->page_sizes_gtt) - 1));
+ expected_node_size = expected_vma_size;
+
+ if (IS_DG2(vm->i915) && i915_gem_object_is_lmem(obj)) {
+ /* dg2 should expand lmem node to 2MB */
Should this test be NEEDS_COMPACT_PT()?
Otherwise LGTM. Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström
<thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>