Hi Laurent,
> Subject: Re: [RFC 10/28] drm: rcar-du: of: Increase buff size for
> compatible variable
>
> Hi Geert,
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:18:52AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 2:52 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 11:17:19AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 6:46 PM Biju Das wrote:
> > > > > Increase buff size for compatible variable to avoid stack
> > > > > corruption with RZ/G2L SoC's(renesas,du-r9a07g044l) which
> > > > > requires a buff size more than the current allocated size.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your patch!
> > > >
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_of.c
> > > > > @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static void __init rcar_du_of_lvds_patch(const
> struct of_device_id *of_ids)
> > > > > struct device_node *lvds_node;
> > > > > struct device_node *soc_node;
> > > > > struct device_node *du_node;
> > > > > - char compatible[22];
> > > > > + char compatible[24];
> > > > > const char *soc_name;
> > > > > unsigned int i;
> > > > > int ret;
> > > >
> > > > What about changing the code to use kasprintf() instead, to
> > > > prevent this from ever happening again?
> > >
> > > Or maybe it's time to drop this backward compatibility code altogether
> ?
> >
> > The last R-Car Gen2 DTS was converted in commit edb0c3affe5214a2
> > ("ARM: dts: r8a7793: Convert to new LVDS DT bindings") in v4.17.
> > The last RZ/G1 DTS was converted in commit 6a6a797625b5fe85 ("ARM:
> > dts: r8a7743: Convert to new LVDS DT bindings") in v5.0.
> >
> > Both are older than commit 58256143cff7c2e0 ("clk: renesas: Remove
> > R-Car Gen2 legacy DT clock support") in v5.5, so I'd say let's get rid
> > of it.
>
> Let's do so then. Biju, would you drop the compat code in v2, or would you
> like me to send patches ?
Please drop this patch and feel free to send patches, as I am busy with bring
up of RZ/G2UL SoC.
Regards,
Biju
