Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 1/9] dma-buf: consolidate dma_fence subclass checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 1/20/22 14:27, Christian König wrote:
Consolidate the wrapper functions to check for dma_fence
subclasses in the dma_fence header.

This makes it easier to document and also check the different
requirements for fence containers in the subclasses.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
---
  include/linux/dma-fence-array.h | 15 +------------
  include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h |  3 +--
  include/linux/dma-fence.h       | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h b/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h
index 303dd712220f..fec374f69e12 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h
@@ -45,19 +45,6 @@ struct dma_fence_array {
  	struct irq_work work;
  };
-extern const struct dma_fence_ops dma_fence_array_ops;
-
-/**
- * dma_fence_is_array - check if a fence is from the array subsclass
- * @fence: fence to test
- *
- * Return true if it is a dma_fence_array and false otherwise.
- */
-static inline bool dma_fence_is_array(struct dma_fence *fence)
-{
-	return fence->ops == &dma_fence_array_ops;
-}
-
  /**
   * to_dma_fence_array - cast a fence to a dma_fence_array
   * @fence: fence to cast to a dma_fence_array
@@ -68,7 +55,7 @@ static inline bool dma_fence_is_array(struct dma_fence *fence)
  static inline struct dma_fence_array *
  to_dma_fence_array(struct dma_fence *fence)
  {
-	if (fence->ops != &dma_fence_array_ops)
+	if (!fence || !dma_fence_is_array(fence))
  		return NULL;
return container_of(fence, struct dma_fence_array, base);
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h b/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h
index 54fe3443fd2c..ee906b659694 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h
@@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ struct dma_fence_chain {
  	spinlock_t lock;
  };
-extern const struct dma_fence_ops dma_fence_chain_ops; /**
   * to_dma_fence_chain - cast a fence to a dma_fence_chain
@@ -61,7 +60,7 @@ extern const struct dma_fence_ops dma_fence_chain_ops;
  static inline struct dma_fence_chain *
  to_dma_fence_chain(struct dma_fence *fence)
  {
-	if (!fence || fence->ops != &dma_fence_chain_ops)
+	if (!fence || !dma_fence_is_chain(fence))
  		return NULL;
return container_of(fence, struct dma_fence_chain, base);
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
index 1ea691753bd3..775cdc0b4f24 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
@@ -587,4 +587,42 @@ struct dma_fence *dma_fence_get_stub(void);
  struct dma_fence *dma_fence_allocate_private_stub(void);
  u64 dma_fence_context_alloc(unsigned num);
+extern const struct dma_fence_ops dma_fence_array_ops;
+extern const struct dma_fence_ops dma_fence_chain_ops;
+
+/**
+ * dma_fence_is_array - check if a fence is from the array subclass
+ * @fence: the fence to test
+ *
+ * Return true if it is a dma_fence_array and false otherwise.
+ */
+static inline bool dma_fence_is_array(struct dma_fence *fence)
+{
+	return fence->ops == &dma_fence_array_ops;
+}
+
+/**
+ * dma_fence_is_chain - check if a fence is from the chain subclass
+ * @fence: the fence to test
+ *
+ * Return true if it is a dma_fence_chain and false otherwise.
+ */
+static inline bool dma_fence_is_chain(struct dma_fence *fence)
+{
+	return fence->ops == &dma_fence_chain_ops;
+}
+
+/**
+ * dma_fence_is_container - check if a fence is a container for other fences
+ * @fence: the fence to test
+ *
+ * Return true if this fence is a container for other fences, false otherwise.
+ * This is important since we can't build up large fence structure or otherwise
+ * we run into recursion during operation on those fences.
+ */
+static inline bool dma_fence_is_container(struct dma_fence *fence)
+{
+	return dma_fence_is_array(fence) || dma_fence_is_chain(fence);
+}

What's the strategy here moving forward if we add more dma_resv containers, or if a driver adds a container that similarly has risc of recursion? Should we perhaps add an ops bool for this, or require that all dma_resv containers that has this limitation be part of the dma-buf subsystem rather than driver-specific?

Thanks,
/Thomas


+
  #endif /* __LINUX_DMA_FENCE_H */



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux