On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 5:58 PM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> When the dw-hdmi bridge is in first place of the bridge chain, this
> means there is no way to select an input format of the dw-hdmi HW
> component.
>
> Since introduction of display-connector, negotiation was broken since
> the dw-hdmi negotiation code only worked when the dw-hdmi bridge was
> in last position of the bridge chain or behind another bridge also
> supporting input & output format negotiation.
>
> Commit 0656d1285b79 ("drm/bridge: display-connector: implement bus fmts callbacks")
> was introduced to make negotiation work again by making display-connector
> act as a pass-through concerning input & output format negotiation.
>
> But in the case where the dw-hdmi is single in the bridge chain, for
> example on Renesas SoCs, with the display-connector bridge the dw-hdmi
> is no more single, breaking output format.
>
> Reported-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Bisected-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 0656d1285b79 ("drm/bridge: display-connector: implement bus fmts callbacks").
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Remove bad fix in dw_hdmi_bridge_atomic_get_input_bus_fmts
> - Fix typos in commit message
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c
> index 54d8fdad395f..97cdc61b57f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c
> @@ -2551,8 +2551,9 @@ static u32 *dw_hdmi_bridge_atomic_get_output_bus_fmts(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> if (!output_fmts)
> return NULL;
>
> - /* If dw-hdmi is the only bridge, avoid negociating with ourselves */
> - if (list_is_singular(&bridge->encoder->bridge_chain)) {
> + /* If dw-hdmi is the first or only bridge, avoid negociating with ourselves */
> + if (list_is_singular(&bridge->encoder->bridge_chain) ||
> + list_is_first(&bridge->chain_node, &bridge->encoder->bridge_chain)) {
What if we use bridge helper, drm_bridge_chain_get_first_bridge in
order to find the first bridge in chain?
Thanks,
Jagan.
