Hi Inki, On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 02:18, Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > 22. 1. 12. 오후 7:05에 Robert Foss 이(가) 쓴 글: > > Thank you again for catching this and submitting a revert. > > > > Reviewed-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > Applied to drm-misc-next. > > > > Trivial thing I think but just notice. With this applying - original patch set and revert one, merge conflict may happen on drm-next because drm-misc-next has this patch set exynos-drm-next tree doesn't include. > Leaving this patch history in drm-misc-next is correct? Thanks for paying attention to this. If we end up seeing a conflict, the exynos patches can go in through drm-misc.
