Hi Christophe,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 11:37:25PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> sn65dsi83_parse_dt() takes a reference on 'ctx->host_node' that must be
> released in the error handling path of the probe.
> This is only done in the remove function up to now.
>
> Fixes: ceb515ba29ba ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add TI SN65DSI83 and SN65DSI84 driver")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> index 945f08de45f1..6edea9f8f8c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> @@ -673,8 +673,10 @@ static int sn65dsi83_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> return ret;
>
> ctx->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &sn65dsi83_regmap_config);
> - if (IS_ERR(ctx->regmap))
> - return PTR_ERR(ctx->regmap);
> + if (IS_ERR(ctx->regmap)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(ctx->regmap);
> + goto err_put_node;
> + }
There's another similar issue if sn65dsi83_parse_dt() fails. Would you
mind fixing them all in the same patch ?
>
> dev_set_drvdata(dev, ctx);
> i2c_set_clientdata(client, ctx);
> @@ -691,6 +693,8 @@ static int sn65dsi83_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>
> err_remove_bridge:
> drm_bridge_remove(&ctx->bridge);
> +err_put_node:
> + of_node_put(ctx->host_node);
> return ret;
> }
>
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
