On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 05:21:17PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> GGTT was available both through i915->ggtt and gt->ggtt, and we
> eventually want to get rid of the i915->ggtt one.
> Move the GGTT from i915 to gt and use to_gt() for accesssing the
> ggtt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
...
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> index 14216cc471b1..02fc7641b82e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ enum intel_submission_method {
> struct intel_gt {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915;
> struct intel_uncore *uncore;
> - struct i915_ggtt *ggtt;
> + struct i915_ggtt ggtt;
>
> struct intel_uc uc;
>
I'm not sure this is the direction we want to go. Although it works for
the initial multi-tile support, there's some other stuff coming up soon
that will require two intel_gt's to share the same ggtt rather than
each having an independent one.
Matt
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
