Can the DRM maintainers accept this Reviewed by patch?
Links to the Reviewed by patch:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/10/27/982
https://lore.kernel.org/all/1635366613-22507-1-git-send-email-george.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxx/
Thank you,
George
On 10/28/2021 4:05 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:32 PM George Kennedy
<george.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Do a sanity check on pixclock value to avoid divide by zero.
If the pixclock value is zero, the cirrusfb driver will round up
pixclock to get the derived frequency as close to maxclock as
possible.
Syzkaller reported a divide error in cirrusfb_check_pixclock.
divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 0 PID: 14938 Comm: cirrusfb_test Not tainted 5.15.0-rc6 #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2
RIP: 0010:cirrusfb_check_var+0x6f1/0x1260
Call Trace:
fb_set_var+0x398/0xf90
do_fb_ioctl+0x4b8/0x6f0
fb_ioctl+0xeb/0x130
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x19d/0x220
do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Signed-off-by: George Kennedy <george.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
